 | | What might have been...
|
|
After reading a number of posts from people who are disappointed at some of the sets I wondered what kind of reaction previous years LEGO sets would have got if LUGNET was around........ummmm....... Airport Shuttle #6399. "What a lame excuse for a (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: What might have been...
|
|
(...) Well, before LUGNET, remember, there was (and still is) RTL, and before that, there was ATL. Same crowd of people, more or less. --Todd (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: What might have been...
|
|
(...) The man makes a point. After seeing the LEGO y2k catalog, the one thing that's been going around and around in my head is the notion that we are getting older -- all of us -- while the average age of TLG's targeted audience is pretty much (...) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: What might have been...
|
|
(...) Er, my point was that what's happening now is absolutely nothing new. Many people have been disappointed every single year since I can remember (back to about November of 1993). Nothing has changed this year except it sounds this year like the (...) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: What might have been...
|
|
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:FKyLEt.DK8@lugnet.com... (...) of (...) I think his point was that back then there still would have been people who maligned the now-lusted after sets, and in the future the current (...) (25 years ago, 4-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
