Subject:
|
Re: GMLTC module at BayLUG follow-up
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Fri, 13 Aug 1999 16:05:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
216 times
|
| |
|
|
John Neal wrote:
>
> Mookie wrote:
>
> > David Zonker Harris wrote:
> > <snip>
> > > I still think we could build up a height-transition module from
> > > table-top height to module height. ;-)
> > >
> > >
> > > -Z-
> >
> > You know that would probably be a great idea for you guys to do...
> > instead of each club having the same height tables, build 2 that will
> > give you a graded uphill and downhill to the level of the other table.
> > Gives you a little more variance over a "flat" layout. Granted most of
> > the tables have some type of rise to them in spots, though how about
> > adding a small city valley?? hmmm I'll keep that idea in mind whenever
> > I get the chance to start on some train tables.... <sings.. In the year
> > 2525 :-) >
>
> "If we're still alive.." ;-)
Well I sure hope I will be!!! I should still be a young spry chicken in
that year :) <don's the hip boots>
--
Keep on Bricken'
-Tamy
Follow the bouncing boxes!
http://home.att.net/~mookie1/jambalaya.html
http://home.att.net/~mookie1/
http://mookie.iwarp.com/ (mirror site)
Lego isn't a toy, it's a way of life!
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: GMLTC module at BayLUG follow-up
|
| (...) Sounds good, especially since we won't have nearly the bricks that GMLTC has to work with. It could even be that a bridge goes over a lowered section of water. This is a timely suggestion too, being that November is our next train-themed (...) (25 years ago, 13-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
Message is in Reply To:
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
