Subject:
|
Re: GMLTC module at BayLUG follow-up
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Fri, 13 Aug 1999 05:36:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
292 times
|
| |
|
|
David Zonker Harris wrote:
<snip>
> I still think we could build up a height-transition module from
> table-top height to module height. ;-)
>
>
> -Z-
You know that would probably be a great idea for you guys to do...
instead of each club having the same height tables, build 2 that will
give you a graded uphill and downhill to the level of the other table.
Gives you a little more variance over a "flat" layout. Granted most of
the tables have some type of rise to them in spots, though how about
adding a small city valley?? hmmm I'll keep that idea in mind whenever
I get the chance to start on some train tables.... <sings.. In the year
2525 :-) >
--
Keep on Bricken'
-Tamy
Follow the bouncing boxes!
http://home.att.net/~mookie1/jambalaya.html
http://home.att.net/~mookie1/
http://mookie.iwarp.com/ (mirror site)
Lego isn't a toy, it's a way of life!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | GMLTC module at BayLUG follow-up
|
| Since I missed some of the original threads where folks detailed how one goes about building a GMLTC module, I was quite pleased that Mike actually did make it to our meeting. I think that his module was deliberately two heights, exposing some of (...) (25 years ago, 11-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
