Subject:
|
Re: GMLTC module at BayLUG follow-up
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Fri, 13 Aug 1999 06:52:17 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
johnneal@uswestIHATESPAM.net
|
Viewed:
|
317 times
|
| |
|
|
Mookie wrote:
> David Zonker Harris wrote:
> <snip>
> > I still think we could build up a height-transition module from
> > table-top height to module height. ;-)
> >
> >
> > -Z-
>
> You know that would probably be a great idea for you guys to do...
> instead of each club having the same height tables, build 2 that will
> give you a graded uphill and downhill to the level of the other table.
> Gives you a little more variance over a "flat" layout. Granted most of
> the tables have some type of rise to them in spots, though how about
> adding a small city valley?? hmmm I'll keep that idea in mind whenever
> I get the chance to start on some train tables.... <sings.. In the year
> 2525 :-) >
"If we're still alive.." ;-)
>
>
> --
> Keep on Bricken'
> -Tamy
>
> Follow the bouncing boxes!
> http://home.att.net/~mookie1/jambalaya.html
>
> http://home.att.net/~mookie1/
> http://mookie.iwarp.com/ (mirror site)
> Lego isn't a toy, it's a way of life!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: GMLTC module at BayLUG follow-up
|
| David Zonker Harris wrote: <snip> (...) You know that would probably be a great idea for you guys to do... instead of each club having the same height tables, build 2 that will give you a graded uphill and downhill to the level of the other table. (...) (25 years ago, 13-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
