Subject:
|
Re: Train set #3225 - new for sale!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Wed, 21 Jul 1999 03:30:53 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
Mookie@innocent%spamless%.com
|
Viewed:
|
427 times
|
| |
|
|
I suppose so :) though there really isn't any other polite way to
address a man other than Mr.. where as females we get many more
choices.. Mrs. Ms. Miss Lady, Ma'am... ugh... and you can never go
wrong calling a woman Miss, unless she's a total feminist, then she'll
chew you up and spit you out :)
Though I think this is getting a little off topic now... Follow up's can
go there.. I just don't know exactly how to set it there in the first
place...
Steve Bliss wrote:
>
> On Mon, 19 Jul 1999 15:22:05 GMT, Mookie <Mookie@execpc.com> wrote:
>
> > ya know... if I gotta take a choice of those two headings... I'll take
> > sir over that other one!!!! that 2nd one just grates on me for some
> > reason.. it makes me feel like I'm 70 years old when someone says that
> > to me!
>
> A lot of guys feel the same way about being called "sir". But I bet they'd
> like being called "ma'am" even less.
>
> Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Train set #3225 - new for sale!
|
| (...) In Southern California, "Dude" is acceptable, just as "Dumbass" is acceptable in New York. (...) Yes, it's a nice term. And those women who like "Mrs." will tell you so, and not unkindly. They're kinda proud of it. (...) Usually when that (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
Message is in Reply To:
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
