Subject:
|
Re: Star Wars <=> Star Trek
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Sat, 15 May 1999 00:50:03 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
jsproat@geocities.com&Spamcake&
|
Viewed:
|
225 times
|
| |
|
|
Tom McDonald wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Jeremy H. Sproat writes:
> > I'm not posting this in lugnet.starwars in order to reduce the amount of
> > flamage I'll receive. :-,
> Almost seems more like a troll.
*sigh* I admit it, it's a troll. I'm immensly bored today, and LUGNET ng
traffic is pretty low. And a cow-orker absolutely roard when I mentioned
the "conspiracy", so I thought I'd pass it along... What'a s bored engineer
to do? Write code?
> Much science fiction and fantasy has rather tritely named stories anyway.
Here's a challenge: find one that *isn't*. Hah? Aha! :-P
> BTW, I thought the word THE was not supposed to count in acronyms unless a word
> was spelled in the process.
I know. Weird, isn't it?
Cheers,
- jsproat
--
Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@geocities.com>
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Horizon/5249/
May the Force be with y'all.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Star Wars <=> Star Trek
|
| (...) Almost seems more like a troll. (...) I think the wording is supposed to seem like it's named in the genre of the old Saturday afternoon serial movie, even if it does sounds like an episode of Scooby-Doo. And, those words might be accurate. (...) (25 years ago, 14-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
