Subject:
|
Re: Star Wars <=> Star Trek
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Fri, 14 May 1999 22:45:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
314 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Tom McDonald writes:
> when replying, note there is already an acronym in spamcake.
Why, you're right!
Self-Propelled Amorphous Mutating Creation of Adventerous Killer Emus.
;-)
James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/
OBsomething: is it just me, or is a significant percentage of .fun occuring
because of Tom's sig lines?
Which gives me one of those <shudder> thoughts: I don't think I ever want to
see "OBspamcake" become common <shudder>
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Star Wars <=> Star Trek
|
| (...) Isn't "OB!!!spamcake" the sound one makes as they bite into a reuben sandwich only to discover that instead of rye it was made with spamcake? Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 14-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | Re: Star Wars <=> Star Trek
|
| (...) Ya know what? I think I killed one of those in my last AD&D session. Right before the party was wiped out by the Plush Golem. ;) (...) Thats 'cause they're funny! (...) Awww... You're no fun!! :( <-very poor rendition of a pouty face (is there (...) (26 years ago, 16-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Star Wars <=> Star Trek
|
| (...) Almost seems more like a troll. (...) I think the wording is supposed to seem like it's named in the genre of the old Saturday afternoon serial movie, even if it does sounds like an episode of Scooby-Doo. And, those words might be accurate. (...) (26 years ago, 14-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
