To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.funOpen lugnet.off-topic.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Fun / 1706
1705  |  1707
Subject: 
Re: Star Wars <=> Star Trek
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Fri, 14 May 1999 21:39:44 GMT
Viewed: 
277 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Jeremy H. Sproat writes:
I'm not posting this in lugnet.starwars in order to reduce the amount of
flamage I'll receive.  :-,

Almost seems more like a troll.

The title "The Phantom Menace" has always bugged me -- the wording seems
pretty silly / trite.

I think the wording is supposed to seem like it's named in the genre of the old
Saturday afternoon serial movie, even if it does sounds like an episode of
Scooby-Doo. And, those words might be accurate. Much science fiction and
fantasy has rather tritely named stories anyway.

Hmmm...  Lesse...

Star Trek episode one was "Star Trek: The Motion Picture".  Acronym,
"ST:TMP".

Star Wars episode one is "Star Wars: The Phantom Menace".  Acronym,
"SW:TPM".

This is way too close to be coincidental.  I thought Lucas was supposed to
burn out *after* these new movies are in the can.

Why, you're right! They both have acronyms. This just *can't* be coincidental.

BTW, I thought the word THE was not supposed to count in acronyms unless a word
was spelled in the process.

-Tom McD.
when replying, note there is already an acronym in spamcake.



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: Star Wars <=> Star Trek
 
Chewie=Worf...both hairy *with* attitudes! "Phaser"="Blaster"... *both* end in "er"!! This is too eerie; I'm gonna quit now. -John (...) (26 years ago, 14-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
  Re: Star Wars <=> Star Trek
 
(...) Why, you're right! Self-Propelled Amorphous Mutating Creation of Adventerous Killer Emus. ;-) James (URL) is it just me, or is a significant percentage of .fun occuring because of Tom's sig lines? Which gives me one of those <shudder> (...) (26 years ago, 14-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
  Re: Star Wars <=> Star Trek
 
(...) *sigh* I admit it, it's a troll. I'm immensly bored today, and LUGNET ng traffic is pretty low. And a cow-orker absolutely roard when I mentioned the "conspiracy", so I thought I'd pass it along... What'a s bored engineer to do? Write code? (...) (26 years ago, 15-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

Message is in Reply To:
  Star Wars <=> Star Trek
 
I'm not posting this in lugnet.starwars in order to reduce the amount of flamage I'll receive. :-, The title "The Phantom Menace" has always bugged me -- the wording seems pretty silly / trite. Hmmm... Lesse... Star Trek episode one was "Star Trek: (...) (26 years ago, 14-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

19 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR