Subject:
|
Re: Etymology of "mecha" and possible fixes
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Mon, 15 Mar 1999 11:32:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
954 times
|
| |
|
|
On Mon, 15 Mar 1999 06:49:07 GMT, lehman@javanet.com (Todd Lehman) wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.fun, jsproat@geocities.com (Sproaticus) writes:
> > Hey "mecha" fans,
> > I need a new word to describe
>
> Maybe some prefix and suffix gymnastics will turn something up...lessee...
>
>
> > large,
>
> mega-
> monstr-
> gargantu-
> grande-
>
>
> > walking machines
>
> -ped
> -pod
> -saur
>
> robo-
>
>
> > with bad attitudes.
>
> disgruntl-
> clomp-
> stomp-
> smash-
> mash-
> havoc-
> tyranno-
>
>
> Putting those together,
>
> gargantudisgruntlopod
> monstroidomashoped
> megahavocosaurus
> robograndestomposaurus
>
> Hrrm, ok, maybe not. :)
>
> --Todd
What? You think not? I *like* 'em. :-)
Sounds like a good subset function of the set name generator - the model name
generator.
-- Terry K --
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Etymology of "mecha" and possible fixes
|
| (...) Maybe some prefix and suffix gymnastics will turn something up...lessee... (...) mega- monstr- gargantu- grande- (...) -ped -pod -saur robo- (...) disgruntl- clomp- stomp- smash- mash- havoc- tyranno- Putting those together, (...) (28 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
