To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.funOpen lugnet.off-topic.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Fun / 11422 (-20)
  Re: Top Ten Reasons Why Kevin Loch Should be Vilified
 
(...) Now that is good, it is really hard to feel sorry for people that do not back up their files. I will miss this site as I have saved hundreds of pictures from it, all of which I backed up. John P (17 years ago, 16-Jul-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: (Was Re: SCLTC goes Red, White, and Boom! at LEGOLAND California)
 
(...) At first I thought "aw shuddap Al." Then I thought "Wouldn't he have had to know they weren't thumbnails BEFORE he posted? It is all in the same post. Right?". Also makes me wonder what might happen if someone posted pics of their models in (...) (17 years ago, 13-Jul-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
 
  Re: John Leo's opinion of "The West Wing"
 
(...) (URL) (17 years ago, 10-Jul-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  (Was Re: SCLTC goes Red, White, and Boom! at LEGOLAND California)
 
(...) Shameless self-promotion and fake contrition all in the one post. Well done. (17 years ago, 5-Jul-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
 
  Re: Paging Tim Gould, Paging Tim Gould....
 
(...) (2 URLs) (17 years ago, 2-Jul-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
 
  Swarm
 
Get it off of me!!!! (URL) (17 years ago, 21-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing.
 
(...) Which can be a bummer IYAM ;-) (URL) (17 years ago, 8-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
 
  Re: Cafe' Corner (10182)--is anyone building this?
 
(...) But that's okay, I suppose, because it ends up that millions of American boys are buying millions of $$$ worth of Bionicle to build those 3 things. So what ends up good for TLG is good for me (taking the cynical, pragmatic road here:-) Plus, (...) (17 years ago, 1-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
 
  Re: What TLG set "revolutionized" your building?
 
(...) Three-fer-one: "We've" "Weave" "We.tv" I'm so punny, I've got myself in stitches! JOHN (17 years ago, 30-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
 
  Re: What TLG set "revolutionized" your building?
 
(...) Wouldn't that have been "weave"? -Rob (17 years ago, 30-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
 
  Re: What TLG set "revolutionized" your building?
 
(...) (URL) We've> suspected as much. (17 years ago, 30-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
 
  Re: What TLG set "revolutionized" your building?
 
(...) I'm sew plaid you awl seam it that way. -Rob (17 years ago, 30-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
 
  Re: What TLG set "revolutionized" your building?
 
(...) "and all that"? I'm missing the jelly-nexus (But I like that term for a band name!) (...) You are a wise man, Dave! (...) You're right! For starters, I would have complained about your redundancy... (...) I'm filing that info in my Rolodex (...) (17 years ago, 30-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
 
  Re: What TLG set "revolutionized" your building?
 
(...) Hey, it doesn't modder to me one whey or the udder, Rob! JOHN (17 years ago, 30-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
 
  Re: What TLG set "revolutionized" your building?
 
Snip... (...) I'm just dyeing to bobbin here to string you guys along unless, of course, you'd prefer me knot in which case I'll bale. -Rob (17 years ago, 30-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: What TLG set "revolutionized" your building?
 
(...) Well, mint jelly and all that... (...) We've decided that we're just going to skip those. (...) No, but if I'd used the official designation of Mega-Scale Mega Bloks, I'm not sure that you'd have known what I meant. Duplo is "Mega-Scale" LEGO, (...) (17 years ago, 30-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
 
  Re: What TLG set "revolutionized" your building?
 
(...) Yeah, way to go, Dave! That one was money in the bank. Now, if you'd be so kind as to explain it.... (...) ??? Does such a person exist? Has such an intellect ever existed??? <consults Magic 8 Ball> "Outlook not so good". Okay, yes, I know (...) (17 years ago, 30-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
 
  Re: What TLG set "revolutionized" your building?
 
(...) The greatest tragedy in all of this is that I was staring right at a perfect double pun and totally flubbed it: "lamenting" should have been "lamb-minting." Way to miss the easy one, Dave! (...) Sure, in the absence of another term, I'd agree. (...) (17 years ago, 30-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
 
  Re: What TLG set "revolutionized" your building?
 
(...) Ewe know that punning only goats me on! Now bleat it, or wool have to get shearious with you, Dave! (...) I see your point, and yet I can't come up with another term for it. I believe both ideas are encompassed by the term. (...) Spin me (...) (17 years ago, 30-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
 
  Re: What TLG set "revolutionized" your building?
 
(...) Feeling sheepish? (Lamenting your reply even as I type that...) (or is that lamb-menting your reply instead? Hmm...) (...) Micronauts, I'd say! But as far as the juniorization argument goes, I'd suggest that the pre-formed elements (head and (...) (17 years ago, 30-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR