 | | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
(...) I prefer to think of Al as a jerk with the lot. ROSCO (18 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
(...) See, Al, at the end of the day, you're just a plain jerk. JOHN (18 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
(...) In fact it wasn't all online. (...) It wasn't. And the FAQ doesn't say it was. It says "it started making sense to have a group that could participate online". I see no "need" in that excerpt at all. Just as there was no "need" for the (...) (18 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) <snip> Verbose? Who, me?? Dave K -no one around here but us scarecrows... (18 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
(...) Before my time. Ross is the man to ask about that. I don't particularly care. (...) I never said it was. 'Shenanigans' is just a turn of phrase. He seems quite sincere, and verbose. (...) Me too. And sometimes (not every time as some seem to (...) (18 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | A long sentence of relatively little import -- was Re: Co-curator update needed?
|
|
(...) This, of course, would play right into Matthew's idea-- (URL) I'll go-- "Flash! Ou reporters have just unearthed this startling, world shaking discovery!", exclaimed the visibly exhausted reporter as he stood in front of the newscamera and (...) (18 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Standing up! Was... Re: malicious behavior
|
|
Moving this back to o.t.d. for debatable reasions... (...) As a somewhat parenthetical point to what Marc said above (though flowing right from his poat)-- At what point should people 'stand up' against (maybe perceived) transgressions? I mean, (...) (18 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
(...) Say, you're not in the press corps, are you? ;-) Ah, the good, old days of Watergate... (...) Exactly. (...) To Plame? Only that she can get rich off of a book/TV movie deal. Bottom line-- much ado about nothing. JOHN (18 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
(...) Kinda sad, really... ended in a whimper instead of a bang... Eh, I have no idea what the results will be. After all the data I've read, it's pretty convoluted--who said what to whom and when... And, as I'm told around here, in the grande (...) (18 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
(...) <spits pop all over screen> I hope this is an example of that Canadian humour you were talking about! The Libby trial makes this kerfuffle seem like world war! :-) JOHN (18 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
(...) Why the sigh? It says JLUG is not for children and there are no rules. Fine. Now this part I don't get: "The JLUG is a group of Lego enthusiast that are not geographically centred but certainly work together through online communication. After (...) (18 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
(snip everybody) Here's the thing, Dave: you're totally right. But there's no point in worrying about it any more. There seems to be a consensus that it's OK to bully Eric on LUGNET. I've (URL) protested it before>, but apparently the admins and the (...) (18 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
(...) Special deals for lawyers, too! I love it:-) lol (...) And the number one thing LUGNET is about is.... (at least, me) Camaraderie. But hey, I'm into pyro, too! (URL) (I'm in some of those pics!) JOHN (18 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
(...) :sigh: (URL) and (URL) (...) Are you saying he's being accidentally mischievous? (...) No, you probably can't. (...) You chose to butt in with the adversarial stuff. I figured you liked it that way. :shrug: (18 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
(...) I'm not saying it's an injustice that requires severe punishment. It's your perspective that you need to work on. The facts-- Person A, in a position of authority, changed links on the Technic sidebar. The *only* links that were changed were (...) (18 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, John Neal wrote: snip (...) snip (...) FIREWORKS!!! i LOVE fireworks!!! its what I DO !!!! Chris www.thepyroguys.com 1. then what is the number one thing lugnet is about? (18 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: JLUG - Do we need a newsgroup on LUGNET?
|
|
(...) Now that made me smile! :) And if I may be so bold--we do have a forum here for all things JLuggy, and it has the added benefit of contributing to high mirth for *most* members in this group-- (URL) (1) Dave K 1- well, not affiliated with JLug (...) (18 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: JLUG - Do we need a newsgroup on LUGNET?
|
|
(...) (URL) (18 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: JLUG - Do we need a newsgroup on LUGNET?
|
|
(...) Heh... when we can get that site back online, that is. And since LF will probably no longer have substantial forums... that's actually a possibility. ;) But I was REALLY thinking we need more discussion here about BZPower and all things (...) (18 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
(...) Only because it is the only other forum which I know you use, that's all. Really. (...) It wasn't my intention to insinuate that. I was making a comparison based on tone. Style. Manner. That sort of thing. (...) My only point is that a JLUG (...) (18 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
