 | | Re: Appy polly logies (was Re: What about the first?
|
|
(...) I think you mean censure, because: 1. There *is* no censorship practiced on LUGNET. Even accidentally. 2. AFAIK you don't have cancel privs anyway even if there was.(a) a - unless I missed a memo here somewhere... (rummages) nope. (21 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Appy polly logies (was Re: What about the first?
|
|
(...) Thanks. but that actually seems to cost actual money. After buying 5 Maersks (even at US prices) I'm fresh out of that too. (...) ... or take, as the case may be. Are you getting a cut? Also, did you print the inscription on the shirt the nice (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Appy polly logies (was Re: What about the first?
|
|
(...) Oh and I apologise for censoring you Larry, it was totally accidental, I promise... ROSCO (21 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Appy polly logies (was Re: What about the first?
|
|
(...) Lar, perhaps (URL) this> might help. All I do is give, JOHN (21 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Appy polly logies (was Re: What about the first?
|
|
(...) I sent you 3 or 4 already, and that exhausted my stock. Sorry, I'm fresh out now. :-) XFUT .fun because I hope this was in fun... (21 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Shrek 2
|
|
(...) If I have to explain, you probably wouldn't understand anyway. The premature sexualization of our youth is one of the biggest evils of our society. (...) Why did anyone have to change? Kind of a mixed-racial message, no? I was thinking about (...) (21 years ago, 27-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Shrek 2
|
|
(...) No it wasn't wrong. or inappropriate. They didn't refer to anything sexual. It's a feminin underwear. No mentions as to what it could mean, i.e. being a transvestite or being sexy. It was simply an underwaer. A Thong! What's wrong about that? (...) (21 years ago, 27-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Shrek 2
|
|
Spoilers... + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + How on earth was the Pinocchio scene "wrong"? And why should the man get to obey the woman's desire more than the opposite? Fiona loved Shrek as an Ogre and Shref loved himself as an (...) (21 years ago, 27-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Is BrikWars Dead?
|
|
(...) It's not dead, it's resting. Tired and shagged out after a long squawk. Jason Spears | (URL) BrickCentral> (21 years ago, 26-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: What is it?...
|
|
(...) (Success! :-) (...) I don't know. I mean, I like chewing gum, but hate to have in my shoe :-/ (...) That was the stated goal, yes. Apparently the results were good. (...) That's what is called a rhetorical question, isn't it? ;-) Pedro (21 years ago, 26-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: What is it?...
|
|
(...) lol I guessed "pot". (...) I mean, how pathetic! Presumably the ban was because the stupid people couldn't refrain from spitting the stuff out onto the sidewalks! I'm all against a "Nanny State", but what if you have a country full of immature (...) (21 years ago, 26-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | What is it?...
|
|
... that is allowed only for therapeutical use; ... that is sold in pharmacies; ... that requires registration to use; ... that can land you in jail for dealing? (URL) :-) Pedro (21 years ago, 26-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Shrek 2
|
|
(...) John, I think you missed the boat on this one. Although Shrek would have stayed human to make life easier for Fiona, she didn't want him to because she knew that being an ogre is what makes him who he is and who she fell in love with. (...) (21 years ago, 25-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: FLL on Zoom!
|
|
(...) ZOOM Zee - Double Oh - Emm, Boston, Mass, Ohhh - Two - One - Three - Four Ah, the memories.... Paul Sinasohn LUGNET #115 (21 years ago, 25-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Shrek 2
|
|
(...) Yeah, it was inappropriate. But, it was unbelievably hilarious too. You're right, John. I have a big problem with teaching kids that young about erotic attire and attitudes. One example I especially loathe -- and you may have seen this in your (...) (21 years ago, 25-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Shrek 2
|
|
(...) The Pinocchio scene was just wrong. S P O I L E R ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ IF Schrek really loved Fiona, he would have remained human and not let her remain an Ogre. JOHN (21 years ago, 25-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Shrek 2
|
|
Went and saw Shrek 2 Saturday night. Funny beyond words, this is a movie everyone's gotta see. -Tim (21 years ago, 24-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Tim Deering--Onion columnist?
|
|
(...) How do you think he collects all those floating heads? Peace and terribleness, Professor Whateverly (URL) (21 years ago, 20-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Tim Deering--Onion columnist?
|
|
(...) This totally explains the comment he made to me the other day... "Hey Felix, sit in this wheelchair and hold this bazooka." -F (21 years ago, 19-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 419 scammer in .robotics
|
|
(...) OK once I get hold of something, sometimes I worry it to pieces. While reading about a Mecha based combat game (1) (a link found from an orkut profile) I ran across another entry in this fellows blog pointing to a 419 story that's "out of this (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
