|
 | | Re: Support for a 'young' earth.
|
| (...) This has been shot full of holes centuries ago when they found chinese genealogies going back further than 4004 BC. I've mentioned this before. Europeans were scratching their heads about this almost 400 years ago - why can't Creationists get (...) (24 years ago, 6-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|  
bruce
(score: 0.321)
|
|
| | Re: An armed society...
|
| (...) using (...) Not very many. They would tend to get shot for trying. (...) Only criminals use guns as a threat when there is no need. That is why they are criminals. (...) All things being equal otherwise, in areas where it is eaiser to legally (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
half
(score: 0.321)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.321)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.320)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.320)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.320)
|
|
| | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
|
| (...) I don't claim that God didn't make everything. I'm only concerned here with the evidence on hand on what happened. I'm not addressing whether it was directed by God in any fashion or not, but simply what actually took place. (...) If it's (...) (24 years ago, 2-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.320)
|
|
| | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
|
| (...) It should be extremely obvious what I mean, except for someone doing their best to dodge the point. (...) November 98, if I recall. (...) By all means, share your source for it being a fake. (...) You don't admit beating your wife, is the (...) (24 years ago, 1-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.320)
|
|
| | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
|
| (...) I have seen no such claims in any scientific source. (...) I listed those for human evolution from hominids to current man. That's the family/genus/species record. (...) A cat didn't evolve into a dog or vica versa. (...) It's hard to see with (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.320)
|
|
| | Re: Why not Both?
|
| (...) The Creationist movement is primarily U.S. Protestant driven. Not exclusively, of course. Perhaps it's part of the insular nature of the U.S., especially the interior of the country. Europe has been through this all before. Bruce (24 years ago, 27-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.319)
|
|
| | Re: I've said enough...
|
| (...) Evolution. All "macro-evolution" is is a great accumulation of changes over a great deal of time. That's it! The process isn't any different. Since you acknowledge the process happens, all that needs to be established is geologic time (and (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.319)
|
|
| | Re: A whole new debate.
|
| (...) We pointed out that you don't seem to understand that theories are part of science. Your response is to change the subject. How can you tell us that evolution isn't science if you don't understand what science involves? How's this for another (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.319)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.319)
|
|
| | Re: Evolution - Impossible!
|
| (...) Here's what you said: How about another point of view? msnhomepages.talkcit...ssible.htm -Jon (I was being conservative with 10^50) Don't see any conditions, I don't see any call for refutation. Again, you have been challenged by several (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.319)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.319)
|
|
| | Re: Problems with science and metaphysics
|
| (...) No, it's universal because any advanced (I'm speaking extra-terrestrial) society is going to come up with the exact same rules. Different languages, different morals, different outlooks, different values, but the math will be the same. Bruce (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.319)
|
|
| | Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf
|
| (...) Right. So if they're hosted on Brickshelf and thus appear as an ID on posts do they ALSO need to appear in "recent images" (...) Not following you here. Checking that box would not prevent the image from being served up, just from being shown (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
half
(score: 0.319)
|
|
| | Re: Evolution - Impossible!
|
| (...) Dave mentioned elsewhere that he is preparing some kind of response to this, so I am defering to him at the moment rather than duplicate effort. To cover it all would take quite a bit of effort. Tell you what, though, show me where he got any (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.319)
|
|
| | Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf
|
| (...) When the Brickshelf gallery first opened several people were given admin access (mainly just being content cops). The major (possibly only) rule for filtering brickshelf was non-lego related pictures were not allowed. I only deleted pics a few (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
half
(score: 0.319)
|
|
| | Re: Evolution - Impossible!
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jon Kozan writes: you can't). (...) I gave you essentially two options and I'd respond to either: point out where any parts of the article were published in a reputable scientific journal and I'd respond to those, or tell (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.319)
|
