 | | Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races)) —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | (...) There no reason to say this except to let him know that you don't really believe he's right and your wrong, i.e. you *do* have a problem letting him believe you're wrong and he's right. Bruce (24 years ago, 6-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races)) —Robert Bevens
|
| | | | (...) Ahh, but that's only your interpretation of it, remember, I'm an experienced social engineer. Given that you really can't say what I really mean or think. That's not to say I'm trying to manipulate anybody, it just means I'm trying to control (...) (24 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races)) —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | (...) More sophistries. And yes, I can say it (there it is above). Not only that, I'm right. (...) You failed in your stated purpose. It seems you aren't as clever as you like to think you are. (...) Sometimes known as jerking people around. What's (...) (24 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races)) —Robert Bevens
|
| | | | (...) Let's keep you thinking that way, shall we? (...) I like how you say I failed in my stated purpose, but then fail to explain why. Not that it's any real surprise. (...) If you say so. (...) No, not at all. When I take a side I try to argue and (...) (24 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races)) —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | (...) That's a pretty pathetic comeback. I thought you said you are clever - I'd figure you'd use something good for a stock phrase. I'm not impressed. (...) Oh, I'm sorry - you keep telling me how clever you are. I thought you could figure it out. (...) (23 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races)) —Robert Bevens
|
| | | | (...) Well your lame was pretty pathetic. You shouldn't expect any more than you're willing to give out yourself. (...) I think maybe I missed a meeting, I didn't know we were flaming against one another. If that was the case I probably would have (...) (23 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Robert: Just another Troll —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | (...) Hahaha. You got ever worse - where's this cleverness you keep gloating about? A Mystic 8-Ball has better comebacks. Concentrate and ask again. (...) I think I missed that same meeting - why are you flaming *everyone*? I'm for one sick of it. (...) (23 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Robert: Just another Troll —Aaron West
|
| | | | | And now for something completely different: "Gentlemen, you have no chance. Make your time." www.planetstarsiege....video.html Captain West, LSF Ertbergle (23 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Robert: Just another Troll —Steve Lane
|
| | | | | | (...) That explains a lot! I'm now quite glad we don't share an interest in Transformers. Steve (23 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Robert: Just another Troll —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | | (...) Bobby, just answer just *one* question, ok? Just *one*. Here goes...what is your point? *shake* *shake* *shake* ...OUTLOOK NOT SO GOOD... *shake* *shake* *shake* ...REPLY HAZY, TRY AGAIN... *shake* *shake* *shake* ...VERY DOUBTFUL... *shake* (...) (23 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Robert: Just another Troll —Robert Bevens
|
| | | | (...) Oh you are so right, what can I say, I guess ya beat me, huh Bruce? (...) Well I'm not actually. I only flame when I get upset or when I'm hired and certainly haven't been hired for anything here, and I'm not upset...it seems you are though. I (...) (23 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Robert: Just another Troll —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) Immense powers of destruction! I sleep better at night knowing that. (...) And you're actively defending us from external onslaught! I sleep better at night knowing that too. (...) OK, clue us in. (...) When we said *who* was the Mad Hatter? I (...) (23 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Robert: Just another Troll —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | (...) I'm still waiting on your cleverness... (...) Not for lack of trying. (...) Hey, I'm just having some fun! I think you need to develop a thicker skin. Note above how *you* are the one claiming *we* (that includes you, junior) are flaming each (...) (23 years ago, 8-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Robert: Just another Troll —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | (...) Hey Bruce, watch yer attributions - You're actually replying to your own post ((URL) I really think such long & scathin) replies belong in e-mail, rather than a public post. I'd say the same to Robert / Matthew / Mad / ??? but I feel it would (...) (23 years ago, 8-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Robert: Just another Troll —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | (...) I understand the NBA, as noted before here, and the guy retaliating always getting called for the foul. :-) I take it you didn't make it to the end of message, where I said the following: (...) Happy? Bruce (23 years ago, 8-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
