To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 8232
8231  |  8233
Subject: 
Re: More changes at Paypal
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 20 Dec 2000 15:17:54 GMT
Viewed: 
1279 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.market.services, William Brumbach writes:
> > I'd prefer they pay for it with advertising and an IPO.
> 
> Advertising, sure... good idea, but what do you mean when you say "an IPO"?
> 
> That they should find some sucker investors to buy stock in a company that
> doesn't have a revenue model and fund operating expenses out of capital,
> forever?
> 
> Or did you mean something else?
> 
> It's one thing to fund current deficits while building mind and market
> share, if you have a path to profitability. But it is entirely another to
> ask stockholders to fund something that never will make money. As many
> dot.com companies learned the hard way.

You are correct, too many of the e-business get treated by consumers as
"make hey while the sun shines" type deals. Despite that, I think there is a
need for what paypal is providing. However, I see no reason why individuals
should not be able to make straight transfers between banks or CC without
involving a middle man/men.

Scott A

> 
> FUT .debate since this is about economic reality.
> 
> ++Lar



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: More changes at Paypal
 
(...) The ONLY way for two people to exchange wealth without a middle man is to do a direct goods or services for goods or services trade. If you use cash, there is a middleman (the guy who minted the money, and whose guarantee you are depending (...) (26 years ago, 20-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: More changes at Paypal
 
(...) Advertising, sure... good idea, but what do you mean when you say "an IPO"? That they should find some sucker investors to buy stock in a company that doesn't have a revenue model and fund operating expenses out of capital, forever? Or did you (...) (26 years ago, 20-Dec-00, to lugnet.market.services, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

15 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR