Subject:
|
Re: More changes at Paypal
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.services
|
Date:
|
Tue, 19 Dec 2000 15:05:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2036 times
|
| |
|
|
Frank Filz wrote:
> In lugnet.market.services, William Brumbach writes:
> > Don't you love these people? It's OK to suck money OUT of your bank
> > accounts pretty much unlimited but not the other way around. It also peeves
> > me that the default payment option is the bank account given and now you
> > really have to dig to use the credit card option. Of course, that's just my
> > opinion, I could be wrong.
>
> Well, perhaps you'd prefer they eliminated the free option? What they are doing
> can't be done for free. They are almost certainly being charged by a credit
> card clearing house to process the credit card transactions. Where do you
> propose they get this money from? It's also not clear to me that bank drafts
> are without charge, so we may be being lucky there also.
Personally, I think the BUYER should pay the fee. But I don't think they can
legally do that due to the CC laws in place in the US, so there's not much we can
do about it.
As it is, I'm going to have to start charging people 2% more if they are going to
fund the transaction with a CC.
--
| Tom Stangl, Technical Support Netscape Communications Corp
| Please do not associate my personal views with my employer
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: More changes at Paypal
|
| (...) Well, perhaps you'd prefer they eliminated the free option? What they are doing can't be done for free. They are almost certainly being charged by a credit card clearing house to process the credit card transactions. Where do you propose they (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.market.services)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
