Subject:
|
Re: One for the road sir? (Re: US supreme court strikes down...)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 30 Nov 2000 14:03:34 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
ssgore@#saynotospam#superonline.com
|
Viewed:
|
258 times
|
| |
|
|
Scott A wrote:
>
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > A small bit of good news. However when one reads the article one discovers
> > that the court considers drunk driving checkpoints constitutional,
>
> Here in the UK random alchhol test are not strictly legal. However, they do
> sort of occur. However, for 10-20 yaers now drink driving has been
> effectivly stigmatised to the point where even drinking within the legal
> limit (80 mg/l) is frowned upon socially. Having a drink driving conviction
> in the UK, is a sure way to become a social pariah. Because of this climate,
> I have never heard of anyone complain of being stopped and tested (we do
> have the right to a refuse test if stopped).
Yesterday, random alcohol tests declared to be illegal here in Turkey.
What a coincidence..:-)
Selçuk
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
