Debate : 7571


Off-Topic / Debate / 7571	7570 \| 7572

Subject:	Re: One for the road sir? (Re: US supreme court strikes down...)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Wed, 29 Nov 2000 16:55:31 GMT
Viewed:	341 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes: > What! She randomly stopped you and demanded a kiss! How unconstitutional. Let's just say it was mutually voluntary transaction and leave it at that, without going into whether I had an obligation not to take advantage of her state of mind given that she voluntarily put herself into that state and initiated the activity in question. :-) ++Lar

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: One for the road sir? (Re: US supreme court strikes down...)
(...) Oh my. Well, heavens. Quite a time! Um, and Scott, being a Briton, I do hope you realise that your country doesn't have a constitution. Well, I mean, they do have stamina, but no actual Constitution per se. So I suppose the point is moot (...) (24 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: One for the road sir? (Re: US supreme court strikes down...)
(...) It all depends on who you live with I suppose. (...) What! She randomly stopped you and demanded a kiss! How unconstitutional. The supreme court must pass a judgement on this! (The fact the we have neither a constitution or a supreme court (...) (24 years ago, 29-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

11 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search