 | | LP POINT 3.2
|
|
From: (URL) Slave Under libertarian principles, would one have the right sell oneself into slavery? Scott A (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: LP POINT 3.2
|
|
"Scott A" <eh105jb@mx1.pair.com> wrote in message news:G4p3vD.14C@lugnet.com... (...) So what is the point? Why are you now posting these individually? Why couldn't all of this be in one big post from the beginning?? ...I guess I'm learning who is a (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: LP POINT 3.2
|
|
(...) Since this has been posted individually, I will point out that there was a thread (or at least a sub-thread) exploring this point. That debate (and it was a pretty good one) did not convince me one way or the other. Larry and other folks (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: LP POINT 3.2
|
|
"Tim Courtney" <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:G4p48p.2I5@lugnet.com... (...) that (...) They are like this as Larry will only answer one point at a time: (URL) at least he claimed he would. Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: LP POINT 3.2
|
|
"Scott A" <s.arthur@hw.ac.uk> wrote in message news:G4p7xF.Dzv@lugnet.com... (...) I read that as he'll answer one point, when that is said and done, move on to another one, so he's ignoring all the ones after the first until their time comes. Oh (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: LP POINT 3.2
|
|
(...) Me too. That is why I stuck to quick questions. It does look messy though. Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: LP POINT 3.2
|
|
"Scott A" <s.arthur@hw.ac.uk> wrote in message news:G4pAKx.Lz5@lugnet.com... (...) Its looked messy for a long time :o) Almost as big of a mess as some people who don't know how to count have on their hands - just not on a world scale. :-) -- Tim (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: LP POINT 3.2
|
|
(...) What I actually said was this: (from) (URL)Tell you what though, Scott. Pick one point, one thought, one item that (...) and again: (from) (URL)I'll repeat my offer though. If Scott picks one point or small topic and (...) Note the use (in (...) (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: LP POINT 3.2
|
|
(...) Sqirmity squirm. (...) "Directions"? ROTFL. (...) Sqirmity squirm. (...) I think it is. I welcome it. It is gratifying to speak with individuals who are interested in addressing the points... rather than the crowd. "The man who follows the (...) (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: LP POINT 3.2
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:G4qF2F.EyC@lugnet.com... (...) to (...) should (...) Lar- I'm pretty much in agreement with what you said in your post. And sometimes I dunno why I keep skimming o-t.debate. :o) So (...) (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | STUPID QUESTION?
|
|
(...) Is there a way to search for a phrase without getting results for each component word? For instance, can I search for "cypress tree" without getting 1000 results for "tree," 200 results for "cypress," and no results for "cypress tree?" I don't (...) (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: LP POINT 3.2
|
|
<tim's text zapped> Tim, Larry could have ended this days ago if you had just answered my points. He asked me to state them here, look down to "Sorry. Stipulate..": (URL) did stipulate (URL) failed to answer me, instead he cherry picked a point made (...) (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: STUPID QUESTION?
|
|
(...) I am waiting for the stupid question... In the mean time I will answer this non-stupid question. "+cypress +tree" There you go, add a plus in front of each word. Jude FUT lugnet.faq (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: STUPID QUESTION?
|
|
(...) How many grapes can I fit in my mouth? (...) D'oh! And here I thought I was smarter than the average bear. Thank you for your help! Or, since it's been suggested we're the same person: Thank me for my help! Dave! (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: STUPID QUESTION?
|
|
(...) 57 seedless or 48 with seeds. Beyond that I need an intubation tube. (...) You are smarter than the average bear. After all, how many bears use the search engine here on LUGNET? (...) I'm welcome. You should blame ourself for this after all we (...) (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: STUPID QUESTION?
|
|
(...) That's just what I was thinking. Dave! (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: LP POINT 3.2
|
|
"Scott A" <eh105jb@mx1.pair.com> wrote in message news:G4qp1v.87r@lugnet.com... (...) I don't think its that simple, but suit yourself :-) BTW - I'll assume that the 'you' there is a typo, where 'he' should have been there. (...) in (...) Second I (...) (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: LP POINT 3.2
|
|
<text topped> <I'm saying that (...) <text tailed> If only you knew me. I'm far too disorganised to have any sort of master plan. I'm sorry if I have offended your sensibilities... I really am. Scott A (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: LP POINT 3.2
|
|
"Scott A" <eh105jb@mx1.pair.com> wrote in message news:G4qvDE.4D6@lugnet.com... (...) some (...) plan. (...) You know...we lose 90% of our communication online. Its an easy mistake. Well, you now see where I stand. Know that I don't hate you - don't (...) (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: LP POINT 3.2
|
|
I realize I am probably going to blasted for this reply but who cares. I have been in my share of scrapes before. Those of course include the "Marmite Campaign" and my personal favourite... (...) pot kettle black (...) Pot Kettle Black (...) POT (...) (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: LP POINT 3.2
|
|
ROTFLMAO!!!!! :-D -- Tim Courtney - tim@zacktron.com (URL) - Centralized LDraw Resources (URL) - Zacktron Alliance ICQ: 23951114 - AIM: TimCourtne "Jude Beaudin" <shiningblade@home.com> wrote in message news:G4qwz7.C85@lugnet.com... (...) have (...) (...) (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: LP POINT 3.2
|
|
(...) Consider joining and filling out your member page, I find that often does put a "face" behind the posting ID. At least it does for me anyway... I dunno about others and whether they look at member pages a lot. (...) Scott, rest assured that (...) (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: LP POINT 3.2
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:G4rA0D.9qp@lugnet.com... (...) That does help, I like looking at the pages and learning about people too. And I love Legofests...so what gives? :o) Anyways, Scott, I think ++Lar is (...) (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: LP POINT 3.2
|
|
(...) What does that mean? Selçuk (24 years ago, 29-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: LP POINT 3.2
|
|
(...) "The pot calling the kettle black." Accusing someone of something the accuser is equally guilty of (actually this statement is used to point out the fact). Bruce (24 years ago, 29-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: LP POINT 3.2
|
|
"Bruce Schlickbernd" <corsair@schlickbernd.org> wrote in message news:G4sotK.9BH@lugnet.com... (...) ...in this case, for those who don't recall, a play on the words of MM. (no, I won't spell it out, becuase I could get ToSsed for swearing) ;-) -- (...) (24 years ago, 29-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: LP POINT 3.2
|
|
(...) Wow, I should have guessed it. We have the very similar one, meaning exactly the same: "Saucepan calling your bottom is black" ..:-) Selçuk (24 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
