 | | LP POINT 3 —Scott Arthur
|
| | | 4 Quick Questions: 1. Race Under libertarian principles, would one have the right discriminate against others based on race? 2. Slave Under libertarian principles, would one have the right sell oneself into slavery? 3. Regulation Would medical (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: LP POINT 3 —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | One point at a time. I'm not willing to invest more of my free time in teaching singing at this point. (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: LP POINT 3 —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) You are avoiding my points Larry - YES or No is all that is required. Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: LP POINT 3 —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | (...) I'm hardly Libertarian, but I think I can field a few of these: (...) Sure, as one is able to discriminate now, based on race. Not currently in terms of employment or pay, but the right to associate or not to associate is spelled out very (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: LP POINT 3 —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | | | (...) No, my understanding of Libertarian philosophy is that you can say, "Irish aren't allowed." Or blacks, or Jews, or fat people, or whatever. People are free to boycott companies/individuals that do this, of course. I'll snip the rest 'cause I (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: LP POINT 3 —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | | "Bruce Schlickbernd" <corsair@schlickbernd.org> wrote in message news:G4p4oC.3w2@lugnet.com... (...) against (...) in (...) associate (...) one (...) or (...) Or they may choose to seek them out. They may prefer a "no Irish" way of life? Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: LP POINT 3 —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Exactly. In theory, EVERYONE might decide "no Irish" and will only patronize No Irish establishments. To answer your question elsewhere, yes, schools could operate on a "no blacks" basis. I regard this as a much bigger point than the one that (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: LP POINT 3 —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | "Dave Schuler" <orrex@excite.com> wrote in message news:G4p452.23y@lugnet.com... (...) against (...) in (...) one (...) or (...) Fair points. But could, say, a school operate on a "no blacks" basis? (...) it. (...) Fair point. (...) work. (...) (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: LP POINT 3 —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | (...) Yes. I have never met a Libertarian who said otherwise. Most think it dumb, but they do believe you should be able to. (...) In the form of indentured servitude, yes. (...) I don't have the "official" Libertarian answer to this. This would be (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: LP POINT 3 —Scott P. Costello
|
| | | | | I am not a registered Libertarian, but I feel my ideology closely matches theres so let me give these a shot. (...) Yes, and in a very short period of time an individual or company with such a limited scope would be a failure; but let society and (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: LP POINT 3 —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | I'm answering based on what I think is right and wrong, and how Christopia (not Libertopia) would be. I suspect that many Libertarians agree. (Though I disagree with some of what Bruce and Scott said.) (...) Absolutely. (...) I waver on this issue. (...) (24 years ago, 2-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
