 | | Re: Rumor control?
|
| (...) Rather a harsh way to put it, but yes, I believe that if you take what Al has said at one time or another at face value, he does see global warming as such a huge problem that any measures may not be too drastic, including disassembling all of (...) (24 years ago, 17-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Rumor control?
|
| (...) Oh, you know--that durned Clinton and his gas tax are so bad that the honest working man can't even drive his own car anymore! Dave! (24 years ago, 18-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Rumor control?
|
| (...) Well, all I can say to that is look out for Hillary! for prez in '04 (why does she get to use an exclamation point?? is it because the mere mention of her name is scary?) If you thought the conspiracy theorists were having fun now, just wait. (...) (24 years ago, 18-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Rumor control?
|
| (...) Heehee! Well, two answers... My usual explanation is that "I'm the kind of Dave that people get excited about," and then when the laughter dies down I offer the further explanation that I started using it when I learned what the exclamation (...) (24 years ago, 18-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Rumor control?
|
| (...) Oh hey! I like that. It'll drive the Republicans up the wall. Almost worth it from that standpoint alone! :-) Of course, they'd be worrying needlessly since the first female elected president will be a conservative (not because Republicans are (...) (24 years ago, 18-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
