 | | Re: Global Warming (was: Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Shiri Dori writes: I give on the icecaps, ok? If they all melt at once, we're all going wading. You still have to show that they're all going to melt, though. Won't take much, a few degrees higher average temp should do (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Global Warming (was: Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?) —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | (...) Well, it's not just the icecaps--it'll rain a lot more, too! 8^) (...) Not to blast Shiri, but in an effort to be fair to those teachers, perhaps the lesson was that the area was covered by seawater, but it was due to the fact that the (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Global Warming (was: Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?) —Christopher Tracey
|
| | | | | (...) Many grade school teachers don't know squat about science, I once got an email from a concerned parent because her son's teacher was telling the students that the grand canyon was formed by a meteorite, as opposed to the less obvious river.... (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Global Warming (was: Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?) —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | (...) IIRC, the 'trends' have been measured as 1 degree celsius (1.8 F) over the past [hundred I think] years. (Dang, wish I had some sources; but I never kept my notes...) The years might be way off, but it's definitely not more than 100; if (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Global Warming (was: Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) That data is suspect. 100 years ago we did not have the technology to determine what the temperature was in a repeatable way over enough sample points to determine what the average temperature is at a given location. We've had that technology (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Global Warming (was: Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?) —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | (...) The determinations of temperature prior to accurate, systematic measurements by humans are derived from other environmental evidence, rather than simply noting what the thermometer said 150 years ago. I regret that I don’t have the particulars (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Global Warming (was: Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?) —Christopher Tracey
|
| | | | (...) They are plenty of ways to confidently estimate temperture. I'm looking at a graph I'm placing into a report right now that has sea-surface temperature estimates off the coast of California back to 130 kyears ago. As Dave said, they are other (...) (25 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Global Warming (was: Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) No, it isn't. And the mob agrees. There is no way that Joe Average is going to give up his petrol and plastics and lots of electricity even if it does mean that we'll leave the Earth a burnt-out husk. (...) I think that there are specific and (...) (25 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
