 | | Re: shills on eBay —Christopher Good
|
| | | (...) Yes it does. I was researching a seller's previous items sold and noticed once that the seller was also the high bidder on an item. I questioned the seller and his reply was that a friend without Internet access wanted the item so he placed (...) (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: shills on eBay —James Brown
|
| | | | | (...) Don't jump to conclusions... I would be inclined to give the seller the benefit of the doubt. As a case in point, easily 1/3 of the items I bid on in Auczilla VIII were for 'off-line' friends, and that jumped to about 1/2 of my bids for (...) (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: shills on eBay —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) How is that a case in point? You didn't sell anything in AucZILLA VIII -- I did. (And I've never shilled, and never will.) --Todd (...) (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: shills on eBay —James Brown
|
| | | | | | | (...) benefit (...) The point I was illustrating (not clear enough, sorry) was not to assume the guy was lying about his off-line friend. James (URL) (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: shills on eBay —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | | (...) OK cool, that's what I thought you probably meant. It certainly was clear for anyone who's been around for a while. I just wanted to point out in no uncertain terms for the record (since there are always new people coming online and getting up (...) (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: shills on eBay —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | I am not sure I'd call it a "shill" but I think it's reasonable, if you decide to run a joint RTL/eBay auction, to set up another id, post feedback stating that it is a proxy for the high RTL bidder and that you'll tell who if emailed (tough to do (...) (26 years ago, 15-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: shills on eBay —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | | | (...) I think that's a good idea. (26 years ago, 15-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: shills on eBay —Barry McFarland
|
| | | | | | (...) I think it is a fair idea (meaning that the process is a fair one). I don't believe that this is consistent with eBay's terms of use. Each ID must be a real person (not quoting the exact language of course). In fact eBay policy is changing on (...) (26 years ago, 21-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: shills on eBay —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | | | (...) I personally wouldn't care if it were consistent with the terms of use. In fact, I e-mailed people like this long before I ever created an active eBay user account, just because people used their e-mail addresses as their user-ids. Now that I (...) (26 years ago, 21-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: shills on eBay —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) If he was the high bidder what difference does it make? It was his set, and he was the high bidder. He still had to pay the eBay fee, I bet, so if he did sell it to his offline friend things worked the same as if he had sold it to the second (...) (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: shills on eBay —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Because adding bids increases demand for the item. So any bidding activity from the seller is suspect. It's a matter of trust. I have a friend who sells at craft fairs. She reports that the thing that increases her sales volume is to have (...) (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Crowds & garage sales —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, blisses@worldnet.att.net (Steve Bliss) writes: [...] (...) [...] I've noticed that sort of thing too! Nothing attracts a crowd like a crowd. :) Last summer, the nextdoor neighbors had a garage sale and asked us if we had (...) (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
