 | | Re: CFD: e-bay (aka ranting and raving) —James Brown
|
| | | (...) <more snipping> (...) Oh, I'm not arguing against the minimum incriment! My point is that its a very seductive trap that e-bay uses (and most auctions, to be fair) to get more money out of the marks. Most people, everytime they're outbid, they (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: CFD: e-bay (aka ranting and raving) —Adam Yulish
|
| | | | | <snip> (...) And that I have no explanation for. I agree 100%, but I cannot explain this "seduction", nor why it happens to some people and not others. <snip> (...) I understand (and thank you! :) but if using an external auction service is (...) (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: CFD: e-bay (aka ranting and raving) —James Brown
|
| | | | | | (...) Hmm, Good point. I would be inclined to argue that the good you bring into the community more than outweighs the (contestable) detriment of using an outside auction service. Actually, it would be more than an inclination - I am arguing it. :) (...) (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: CFD: e-bay (aka ranting and raving) —Adam Yulish
|
| | | | | | | (...) Thanks again :) Yet if using an outside auction service is detrimental, then it doesn't matter how how much good I do--I'm still responsible for detrimental actions. Which is why the question of detriment is important. (...) Ahhh...I think (...) (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: CFD: e-bay (aka ranting and raving) —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | | | | (...) I'm snipping everything else because for this post at least I want to focus on this thought that using an outside service is even possibly detrimental to the community. Sorry to be blunt, but do you know what the hell you're talking about when (...) (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: CFD: e-bay (aka ranting and raving) —James Brown
|
| | | | | | | | (...) You're right, I haven't. To-date, I've done nothing more complicated than a straight sale. I am gearing up for a small set auction, and am considering if the amount of work that would go into a parts auction is worth it to me. I am aware that (...) (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: CFD: e-bay (aka ranting and raving) —Jasper Janssen
|
| | | | | | (...) On my desk, but that's it :) Does anyone have a spare 6067 flag? :) Jasper (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: CFD: e-bay (aka ranting and raving) —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) I may have misunderstood what you said before and responded in a rather offended tone in a previous post. Forgive me if it offended you. But I don't agree with this either. If a set will sell for $100 on RTL but might go for $150 on eBay (...) (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: CFD: e-bay (aka ranting and raving) —James Brown
|
| | | | (...) No problem. I flared up too. (...) Understood. I would just prefer that the buyer who gets it is someone who participates online. From what others have said, about half the winning bids go to people who don't participate in RTL or Lugnet, and (...) (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: CFD: e-bay (aka ranting and raving) —Jasper Janssen
|
| | | | (...) That's rather sad. A box of Beta currently goes for... $2000, I think. Possibly more. Arabian Nights go for $4000, which is totally silly - I calculated once what cards you'd get out of it (pretty good guess, as in each box you get 120 out of (...) (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
