 | | Re: Frog —Tim McSweeney
|
| | | John Neal wrote in message <36BFD70C.8D95A0E6@u...st.net>... (...) our (...) being (...) due (...) orginally, (...) Aha once again a newsgroup discussion boils down to religion. [1] It is interesting that the only way you can justify your belief in (...) (26 years ago, 9-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Frog —John Neal
|
| | | | | (...) Actually, you have a good point. Perhaps a Supreme Being _IS_ the only absolute. If one were not to acknowledge the existence of such, then there would be no absolutes. I can live with that (atheism). I, however, do not concur, but I do have (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Frog —Tim McSweeney
|
| | | | | | (...) absolute (...) be (...) no (...) Desire to be Moral What Desire? Actually this is probably instilled once again from parents, We are told to "Be Good" "You'll get a reward if you do what I say" that sort of thing. It's also probably an (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Frog —Lee Jorgensen
|
| | | | | (...) Reminds me of a little joke I heard a while back ... Person A: There are _NO_ absolutes. Period. Person B: Are you sure? Person A: Absolutely. (for the humor impaired ... the first statement is an absolute in and of itself) -- Lee Jorgensen, (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Frog —James Brown
|
| | | | | | (...) itself) (...) There is an exception to every rule. Including this one. Holy paradoxical statements, Batman! :) James (URL) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Frog —John Neal
|
| | | | | | "Never say never" (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Frog —Selçuk Göre
|
| | | | (...) No..No need to prove. Supreme being is existing. I saw her on TV, and she is a very cute one..:-) (I don't know why, she calls herself as fifth element) Selçuk (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Frog —Jesse Long
|
| | | | Selçuk wrote in message ... (...) absolute (...) is (...) Never thought I'd go for a girl with neon orange hair. Why are all my favorite movies panned by the critics? Jesse ___...___ Jesse The Jolly Jingoist Looking for answers? Read the (...) (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Frog —Selçuk Göre
|
| | | | | Jesse Long wrote in message ... (...) element) (...) Bet you also like " The Postman" and "Waterworld" which are both declared "unnecessary to see" by the critics. And yes, I'd like them, too. .:-) Selçuk P.S.. Since she is the supreme being, and (...) (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Frog —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | (...) In this particular case, it's because it was boron. Steve (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Frog —Terry Keller
|
| | | | | | | (...) Boron? :-) My .02... I thought it was rather bad myself. It looked good, and parts of it were cool, but afterward I left feeling a little cheated. And even more telling, my nephew (10 at the time) said it sucked. And that surprised me. He (...) (26 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Frog —Jesse Long
|
| | | | | | | Terry K wrote in message <36c3bfe8.6485570@lu...et.com>... (...) of it (...) He (...) Well, I'll agree that it could have been a whole lot more. I think if the directors had taken a different approach it would have been a lot better. I think they (...) (26 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Frog —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) Hydrogen, helium, lithium, beryllium (had to look that one up), boron. --Steve (URL) (26 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Frog —Terry Keller
|
| | | | | | (...) I was just smiling because you are periodically amusing. -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 13-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Frog —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) I figured you did. I thought others might not. BTW, I stole the pun from somewhere, but I don't remember where. It could even have been RTL. I'd add another pun, but I'm no good at them. Steve (26 years ago, 15-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Frog —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) Because most of them are pansies and they don't appreciate movies filled with masculine men and naked women? Not that all your favorite movies have those elements, but the fifth element did. :) (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Frog —Jesse Long
|
| | | | | Mike Stanley wrote in message ... (...) Damn straight. (...) So did Starship Troopers, only without the masculine men. I liked Last Action Hero too. Can't pass up an Arnold movie. Except perhaps Commando. I also liked For Love Or Money with Michael (...) (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Frog —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | | (...) I just got Starship Troopers for $9.99 on DVD. I remember it as a fairly mediocre movie. Except for that shower scene maybe... (26 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Frog —Jesse Long
|
| | | | | | | Mike Stanley wrote in message ... (...) Exactly. You're better off with the book. I think the movie was little more than a showcase for cool computer-gore graphics. I try to separate books from movies, but this one was a real sacrilege. Jesse (...) (26 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Frog —John Neal
|
| | | | | | Hey Mike, I wouldn't mind getting ST for 9.99- where did you score that? -John (...) (26 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Frog —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | | | (...) Hrmmm, lemme think. I got it from BigStar - (URL) usually check in on these two sites to find good deals on DVDs: (URL) Unofficial listing of weekly US Lego Shop at Home phone specials (URL) (S@H USA) / 800-267-5346 (S@H Canada) (...) (26 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Frog —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | <slrn7c7dti.4ol.cjc@...S.UTK.EDU> <F712sH.2HC@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) Gratuitous nudity for no other reason than to keep the audience awake hoping it might happen again (well, the (...) (26 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Frog —James Brown
|
| | | | | (...) A friend of mine described it, in a tone he only uses for withering scorn, as "Ken and Barbie Save the Universe, containing all the intellectual fiber of a goat's diet." After I saw it, it struck me that he might have been too kind. :) James (...) (26 years ago, 13-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Frog —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) That would have been so much funnier if you had said "male members" instead of "male part"..... Sorry, had to say it. :) (26 years ago, 13-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
