Subject:
|
Welcome to the Naughties (was Re: Welcome to the Ohs
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 1 Jan 2000 22:52:26 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
[lpieniazek@novera.com]NoSpam[]
|
Viewed:
|
556 times
|
| |
|
|
I prefer the "naughts" or "naughties" to the "Ohs".
On the whole topic, I found it interesting that last century, public
opinion was pretty solid on the start being 1901 (the Grand Rapids MI
Press published an excerpt from the Jan 1 1900 and Jan 1 1901 front
pages that made it pretty clear that everyone thought it was the latter)
But heck, I had a great time last nite, got tipsy, spent some very high
quality time with Josette, got a chance to wear my tux, and I don't have
(much) of a hangover. So I'll be happy to do it again next year.
Although hopefully it won't cost me 900 bucks like it did this year.
Good FUT, Frank.
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
NOTE: Soon to be lpieniazek@tsisoft.com :-)
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Welcome to the Ohs
|
| Mike Petrucelli wrote in message ... (...) 0000 (...) Logically (...) curiosity, do (...) While I can agree with the thought that we have not yet entered the new millenium, we have definitely left the '90s. Of course on another angle, we almost (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
