To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 12946
12945  |  12947
Subject: 
Re: Welcome to the Ohs
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate
Followup-To: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sat, 1 Jan 2000 17:59:18 GMT
Viewed: 
592 times
  
Mike Petrucelli wrote in message ...
In lugnet.general, Rick Kujawa writes:
Happy New Year everyone.  That was the end of the 90's and now its the
beginning of the 0's or the oh ohs.  Now its double 0h zero.

<nitpick mode on>

The Year 2000 is the last year of the '90s (not 90's.)  There was no year • 0000
The first year was 0001.  So 0001 to 0010 is the first decade A.D. • Logically
the last decade of the 20th century is 1991 to 2000.  Just out of • curiosity, do
you count ten things 0 to 9 or 1 to 10?


While I can agree with the thought that we have not yet entered the new
millenium, we have definitely left the '90s. Of course on another angle, we
almost surely have entered the new millenium (I have heard anywhere from 3
to 6 BC for the actual YOB of Jesus). I am actually willing however to
subscribe to the idea that we are indeed in the new millenium since our
calendar is arbitrary anywise, why not make life easier and just state that
new decades start on an xxx0 year, new centuries start on an xx00 year, and
new millenia start on an x000 year.

As for counting from 0 or 1, it depends. If I'm counting memory addresses,
or offsets into a structure or array, I start at 0. If I'm counting the
number of something I have I start at 1.

Frank



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: Welcome to the Ohs
 
(...) Actually, if a particular thrice appearing planetary conjunction were to be interpreted as the star of bethlehem (not an unreasonable speculation, using astrological interpretation), and its first appearance did indeed happen in synch with (...) (24 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Welcome to the Ohs
 
why not make life easier and just state that (...) and (...) Because it's not true. :) It's true that the calendar is somewhat based on arbitrary convention (since Christ was born around 5 BC), but one must stick with convention if it's to be of any (...) (24 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Welcome to the Naughties (was Re: Welcome to the Ohs
 
I prefer the "naughts" or "naughties" to the "Ohs". On the whole topic, I found it interesting that last century, public opinion was pretty solid on the start being 1901 (the Grand Rapids MI Press published an excerpt from the Jan 1 1900 and Jan 1 (...) (24 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Welcome to the Ohs
 
(...) <nitpick mode on> The Year 2000 is the last year of the '90s (not 90's.) There was no year 0000 The first year was 0001. So 0001 to 0010 is the first decade A.D. Logically the last decade of the 20th century is 1991 to 2000. Just out of (...) (24 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)

21 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR