Subject:
|
Re: Welcome to the Ohs
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 3 Jan 2000 21:33:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1249 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Gary R. Istok writes:
>
>
> Tom Stangl wrote:
>
> > <snip>
> > > P.S. Anyone hear about the french clock maker. He made a grandfather • clock in
> > > the 1600s that has a date counter on it. It should be reading 1/1/2000 • right
> > > now. The first "Y2K" compliant device.
> >
> > Doubtful, considering the calendar adjustment of 13 (14?) days in the 1700s
> > somewhere ;-)
> >
> > --
> > | Tom Stangl, Technical Support Netscape Communications Corp
> > | Please do not associate my personal views with my employer
>
> That adjustment from Julian to Gregorian format is also a complicated issue. • It
> happened in Western Europe in 1582, but not the UK until 1752, and not Russia • until
> 1917. So there was a period where when you crossed the English Channel, you • crossed
> not only a time zone (not sure they had them in the 1500-1700's) but a period • of
> 11-14 days difference depending on which century you crossed over.
>
> The Eastern (Orthodox) Church still doesn't recognize the Gregorian Calendar • (not
> sure about the idiosyncracies), hence the holidays are now upon them.
>
> Gary Istok
I forgot to take that whole calander switch mess into account. Still the Idea
of the clock counting to the year 2000 and beyond amuses me to no end.
-Lord Insanity
"A little nonsense now and then, relished by the wisest men"
Visit me at: http://members.tripod.com/~LordInsanity
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Welcome to the Ohs
|
| (...) That adjustment from Julian to Gregorian format is also a complicated issue. It happened in Western Europe in 1582, but not the UK until 1752, and not Russia until 1917. So there was a period where when you crossed the English Channel, you (...) (25 years ago, 3-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
