To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 28332
28331  |  28333
Subject: 
Re: USA vs. UK pay differences
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 27 Mar 2007 22:19:01 GMT
Viewed: 
3174 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Leonard Hoffman wrote:
   In other words, the average American is poorer than the average Briton, and therefore less able to pay the same prices for the same product.

If you’re suggesting that Lego pricing is due to income levels of citizens, I don’t think that’s the case. Some of the issues (as I’ve been told from people in Lego and outside of Lego) are:

My point isn’t that LEGO is saying “Americans make less money, therefore we will charge less” but rather than the uneven income

   1) People in Europe are willing to pay more for toys (and goods in general), whereas Americans are cheap-o’s. Americans are perfectly happy to get crappy 3rd rate merchandise from places like Wal*Mart BECAUSE they’re cheap.

Americans, because they make less, do not buy equally priced (to European sets) LEGO because it is prohibitively expensive for many people, especially compared to super-cheap knock-offs.

   2) Americans are unwilling to pay much in the way of markup. They drastically undervalue the service of middlemen. Americans have very little concept for “reasonable” profit. If a car costs $8000 to manufacture, they often assume that they “ought” to pay $8000 for it, or maybe even $9000.

Yes, hating middlemen is part and parcel of the American identity. Industrialists and Farmers are good. Merchants are bad.

   3) The US is considered a “growing” market. So Lego wants to maintain a presence there because they know it’s a *potentially* valuable market base, even though they don’t make a lot of profit there (relatively speaking).

A huge amount of relatively poor people makes for a lucrative market. (If you can sell for a profit at the reduced price.)

   4) Lego in the US is up against a large share of competitors, unlike in Europe, where it’s typically more dominated by Lego. And, Lego’s US competitors are made more cheaply than Lego, and are sold at lower costs.

Yay free trade!

To reiterate my point - the relative poverty of Americans is an underlying factor in LEGO’s decision to offer different prices for the same set in different regions. Another point might be that Europeans shouldn’t complain because, in the bigger picture, they get a better deal than Americans (more stable, stronger economy, healthcare, etc)

;)

-Lenny



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: USA vs. UK pay differences
 
(...) If you're suggesting that Lego pricing is due to income levels of citizens, I don't think that's the case. Some of the issues (as I've been told from people in Lego and outside of Lego) are: 1) People in Europe are willing to pay more for toys (...) (18 years ago, 27-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

9 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR