Subject:
|
Re: Two questions for the Conservatives and/or Republicans out there
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 11 Oct 2006 02:37:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2182 times
|
| |
|
|
John wrote:
> Well, I am not beholden to Diebold for anything. It seems to me that the bottom
> line is that you don't trust {them}, not the equipment they produce. Companies
> will always have some bias, either left or right; that is a given. What doesn't
> follow is that because of that bias, they will act nefariously to benefit their
> political POV. What is {more} likely is that they will act nefariously to "keep
> the gig". The solution would be to keep the process competitive so that the
> incentive is accurate performance, or face losing the contract.
Umm... Diebold's CEO stated in a letter that he was committed to
delivering Ohio's electoral votes to the president.
http://money.cnn.com/2004/08/30/technology/election_diebold/
BTW, keeping them in office guarantees they keep their gig, So why
should we trust them, when it's been demonstrated over and over that
they didn't design these machines to be secure *AND* they have already
stated that they have a bias?
It's just too blatant.
-JSM
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
17 Messages in This Thread:
  
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
