|
|
 | | Re: At last, some family-values legislation I can really get behind!
|
| (...) **snip** (...) DaveE's (URL) comments> made me realize a few other weaknesses in this argument. First, you're apparently equating homosexuality with being a centenarian or a polygamist, at least to the extent that you think that Hagen is (...) (20 years ago, 27-Feb-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: At last, some family-values legislation I can really get behind!
|
| (...) Well, if he had picked something slightly more equivalent, like "personality type X" or "brown eyes" or "under 5 feet tall", it wouldn't quite get the same type of media attention he's looking for. But I think his point still stands-- IE that (...) (20 years ago, 27-Feb-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: At last, some family-values legislation I can really get behind!
|
| (...) In that case, maybe he needs to join the GOP. (...) Not at all. He equates the utter lack of supporting data for Hood's bogus (though seriously-intended) legislation with the utter lack of supporting data for Hagen's own bogus (and (...) (20 years ago, 27-Feb-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: At last, some family-values legislation I can really get behind!
|
| (...) Mr. Hagen shouldn't quit his day job at the public teet for a career in comedy. He might have a promising career as a professional hypocrite, however. Hagen equates being a republican to being gay. Certainly one can change their party on a (...) (20 years ago, 27-Feb-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | At last, some family-values legislation I can really get behind!
|
| (URL) Good luck, Mr. Hagan!> Hagan admitted that he has no scientific evidence to support the above claims. Just as `Hood had no scientific evidence'' to back his assertion that having gay parents was detrimental to children, Hagan said. Dave! (20 years ago, 27-Feb-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
|
