To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 27639
27638  |  27640
Subject: 
Re: At last, some family-values legislation I can really get behind!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:10:22 GMT
Viewed: 
1396 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
   Good luck, Mr. Hagan!

Hagan admitted that he has no scientific evidence to support the above claims. Just as `Hood had no scientific evidence’’ to back his assertion that having gay parents was detrimental to children, Hagan said.

Mr. Hagen shouldn’t quit his day job at the public teet for a career in comedy. He might have a promising career as a professional hypocrite, however.

Hagen equates being a republican to being gay. Certainly one can change their party on a whim. Can one change their sexual orientation? His implication is that being gay and being republican are two, mutually exclusive qualities. He should stick to the losing game plan of liberals equating “gay rights” to the black civil rights movement.

Mr. Hagen introduces this bill to make a “very serious point”, but how seriously can we take his whine on this complete waste of time on the taxpayers’ dime? (I shudda been a rapper!) Mr. Hagen should leave the “lampooning” to the professionals, namely MAD Magazine. Perhaps he might find his currently effort featured in an upcoming feature!

But what I found most revealing is the wording of his “bill”.

“To further lampoon Hood’s bill, Hagan wrote in his mock proposal that `credible research’’ shows that adopted children raised in Republican households are more at risk for developing `emotional problems, social stigmas, inflated egos, and alarming lack of tolerance for others they deem different than themselves and an air of overconfidence to mask their insecurities.‘’

My bet is that Mr. Hagen actually does believe these things about republicans; from where else is he getting this list (if not projecting;-) The irony is telling, if not pathetic.

I’m sure the tolerant Mr. Hagen will have no problem with polygamist families adopting children as well. How about centenarians? What bigotry, discriminating against the elderly! Disgusting!

If democrats want to get serious and run this country, they’d better clean house of “humorists” such as Mr. Hagen. He’s a liability.

I assume that your tongue was firmly planted in your cheek, Dave!?

JOHN



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: At last, some family-values legislation I can really get behind!
 
(...) In that case, maybe he needs to join the GOP. (...) Not at all. He equates the utter lack of supporting data for Hood's bogus (though seriously-intended) legislation with the utter lack of supporting data for Hagen's own bogus (and (...) (19 years ago, 27-Feb-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
  Re: At last, some family-values legislation I can really get behind!
 
(...) Well, if he had picked something slightly more equivalent, like "personality type X" or "brown eyes" or "under 5 feet tall", it wouldn't quite get the same type of media attention he's looking for. But I think his point still stands-- IE that (...) (19 years ago, 27-Feb-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
  Re: At last, some family-values legislation I can really get behind!
 
(...) **snip** (...) DaveE's (URL) comments> made me realize a few other weaknesses in this argument. First, you're apparently equating homosexuality with being a centenarian or a polygamist, at least to the extent that you think that Hagen is (...) (19 years ago, 27-Feb-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  At last, some family-values legislation I can really get behind!
 
(URL) Good luck, Mr. Hagan!> Hagan admitted that he has no scientific evidence to support the above claims. Just as `Hood had no scientific evidence'' to back his assertion that having gay parents was detrimental to children, Hagan said. Dave! (19 years ago, 27-Feb-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

12 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR