 | | Heads up, atheists
|
| (URL) Finally we shall soon learn the Truth> JOHN (19 years ago, 6-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Heads up, atheists
|
| (...) I'm surprised that this is going to court, honestly. How can you prove that someone didn't exist ~2000 years ago? The best you can do, IMO, is show that the evidence doesn't support the conclusion that he existed. AFAIC, the Gospels are (...) (19 years ago, 6-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Heads up, atheists
|
| (...) Agreed. Kinda like the Scopes trial in reverse;-) (...) He sets up a classic error-- he has so-called proofs that he has written about that Jesus didn't exist-- he claims it is up to the other side to prove him wrong. (...) Even moreso the (...) (19 years ago, 6-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Heads up, atheists
|
| (...) I suspect that Jason Robards won't be starring in the film version of this one, though. (...) That's not always unreasonable, except when the necessary disproof is so burdensome that it becomes practically impossible. If I asserted that my (...) (19 years ago, 6-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Heads up, atheists
|
| (...) <<chuckle>> I have been away for a while. So I kinda walked into this one on the strength of the subject. Silly me. Can't imagine why atheists would care whether there was some bloke called Jesus padding about 2,000 years ago. Must remember to (...) (18 years ago, 8-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Heads up, atheists
|
| (...) Sorry to disappoint. The subject line was a kind of joke-- it was (URL) recycled> for comedic effect. It was just my friendly way of tweaking some non-believing friends around here. As a Christian, I, of course, am vulnerable to the same type (...) (18 years ago, 8-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Heads up, atheists
|
| (...) Okay, now I have to give him props for admitting that he was (URL) wrrr...rrr>. JOHN (18 years ago, 12-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Heads up, atheists
|
| (...) Admitting he was wrong after universal outcry against him. Pat Robertson has said to many crazy things lately for me to take him seriously as a Christian. Threatening God's wrath on the people of a PA town for teaching evolution? Calling for (...) (18 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Heads up, atheists
|
| (...) Bravo, I say. In so doing, Pat demonstrated loud and clear that "Intelligent Design" is in fact the fundamentalist Christian notion of creationism, thereby ending the argument espoused by ID-proponents that it's a "non-theistic" "scientific" (...) (18 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Heads up, atheists
|
| (...) Now that's what I call feigned praise! JOHN (18 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Heads up, atheists
|
| (...) Look, maybe some of the people in a PA town deserve God's wrath! :-) JOHN (18 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Heads up, atheists
|
| (...) Then again, maybe it (URL) won't.> Dave! (18 years ago, 27-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Heads up, atheists
|
| (...) Then again, maybe it (URL) was thrown out.> Personally, I thought that the whole undertaking was a waste of time. Good riddance to some pointless litigation. Dave! (18 years ago, 10-Feb-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Heads up, atheists
|
| (...) Remember that Tootsie Pop® commercial where the "scientist" is doing the experiment to finally find out how many licks does it take to reach the center of the Tootsie Pop sucker? "One, two, thareee, <crunch>...." "Three." As for our story and (...) (18 years ago, 10-Feb-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
