 | | Re: Rückkehr der Raumnazin
|
|
(...) Thanks, but it was pasted directly from babblefish, which also explains the slightly mangled translation. (...) Cheers (...) My interest has less to do with nazism itself than the reaction displaying it's symbols still generates even today. (...) (19 years ago, 22-Dec-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Activist Judges (was Re: Woo-hoo! Dover gets it right!)
|
|
(...) I bet that caused you physical pain to admit that, Dave! :-) You know, I have no problem with evolution being taught as a theory (not fact) in school, as long as the issue is handled honestly: Evolution is a theory, filled with questions and (...) (19 years ago, 22-Dec-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Activist Judges (was Re: Woo-hoo! Dover gets it right!)
|
|
(...) (URL) Here's> the latest. Just who appointed this shameless activist Judge John Jones (not to be confused with the Martian Manhunter) who sees fit to subvert the will of the people and to legislate from the bench? Why, none other than our (...) (19 years ago, 21-Dec-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Roberts-Sophie Mech-off
|
|
I'm just slinging smack, little girl. Just slinging smack. You don't like it, don't play the game. Soren (19 years ago, 19-Dec-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: New Mecha: The Cub
|
|
Stop the pair of you or I'll bang your 'eds together! Blimey.. Back to the bricks please... Eric - you got any ideas on what you might do for toe coverings then? Danny (...) -- Danny Staple MBCS OrionRobots (URL) contact details available through (...) (19 years ago, 24-Nov-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: New Mecha: The Cub
|
|
(...) -snip- (...) Whateva... (...) e (19 years ago, 23-Nov-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Excellent news!
|
|
(...) And (URL) this guy> was executed, so the point is served again. Dave! (19 years ago, 21-Nov-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: We just never seem to learn, do we?
|
|
(...) I agree that the argument is not logically complete, but it is still not an example of the fallacy. The fallacy applies when it is used to link activities which were not a major part of the 'evil' Nazi activities to 'evil'. In this case he is (...) (19 years ago, 20-Nov-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: We just never seem to learn, do we?
|
|
(...) However, the quote given doesn't logically link up. He mentions something historical about Hitler, but doesn't link it to his argument. Further, his argument is made without using the Hitler reference - his only note is that we need to (...) (19 years ago, 20-Nov-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: We just never seem to learn, do we?
|
|
(...) Except that the argument there is not an example of the fallacy. He is comparing right-wing organisations who propose the banning of gay groups to a rather famous right-wing organisation which banned gay groups which is a perfectly valid (...) (19 years ago, 20-Nov-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
