 | | Re: Life size guns and assault rifles on Brickshelf-- opinions? —Richie Dulin
|
| | | (...) Your argument is that I should have acted with more sensitivity? Quoth Lenny (from (URL) this post>): (...) A truly great example of sensitivity there. Even so, I’m not seeing the call for acting with more sensitivity in what you wrote. And (...) (19 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Life size guns and assault rifles on Brickshelf-- opinions? —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | (...) I would just like to point out to all that seem to have formed an incorrect opinion about what JLUG is: JLUG is NOT an adult forum. From the user agreement, JLUG "..is for discussing any facet of creating with bricks but is intended for a (...) (19 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Life size guns and assault rifles on Brickshelf-- opinions? —Leonard Hoffman
|
| | | | | | (...) What does "mature" equate to? Typically the adjectives 'mature' and 'adult' mean the same thing (Mature Language/Adult Language, etc). Or are you suggesting that non-adults can participate in JLUG? Funny thing that you would specifically (...) (19 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Life size guns and assault rifles on Brickshelf-- opinions? —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | (...) Non-adults participate in JLUG and are perfectly welcome to do so. And just to be clear, immature people are also welcome. Just because we say "..intended for a mature audience" does not mean others are not welcome to participate, if they find (...) (19 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | (canceled) —Leonard Hoffman
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Life size guns and assault rifles on Brickshelf-- opinions? —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | (...) I doubt you've made Richie cry but you've certainly made me irked. Stop acting as though you are somehow superior. You've been picking fights just as much as he has. (...) If you are one of these people, you have a valid right to make a (...) (19 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | (canceled) —Leonard Hoffman
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: overreaction was Re: More random flaming —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | Lenny, I assume that by changing the title you see my post as random flaming. It is not at all random and nor is it flaming. You have irritated me with your holier-than-thou attitude and I have merely pointed out some of your character flaws. (...) (...) (19 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | (canceled) —Leonard Hoffman
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: overreaction was Re: More random flaming —Leonard Hoffman
|
| | | | (...) Actually, I saw my post as random flaming. But I feel that my recent posts have been over the line, despite whatever good intentions I may have had, so I had them cancelled. Please take that as a sign of my regret for what I've said. -Lenny (19 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: overreaction was Re: More random flaming —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | | (...) Hi Lenny, I've asked to have mine removed too for the same reasons. No hard feelings! Tim (19 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: overreaction was Re: More random flaming —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | (...) Hi Lenny, I emailed Suz soon after you cancelled your posts to ask for mine to be cancelled too but they are still here (I probably stuffed something up, it's my first cancelling) so if you (or anyone else) can cancel post 27201 and 27206 for (...) (19 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
