To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 25868
25867  |  25869
Subject: 
Re: Lavender Brick Society
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sun, 19 Sep 2004 05:35:33 GMT
Viewed: 
4297 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Kevin Wilson wrote:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Johannes Koehler wrote:
This is, in my opinion, one of the reasons why not-gay people may have mixed
feelings towards gays. It's kind of offending when somebody is obtruding you the
knowledge about his/her sexual orientation or preferences. It's not even
necassary to be frigid or overly conservative for not wanting to know this.
Heterosexual men don't want to be told by every woman her sexual secrets, nor do
heterosexual women (I assume) want to be told this by every man.

Not picking on you particularly Jojo, since this has been said several times by
several people in different ways in this thread.

There are a couple of points here. Firstly, heterosexuals frequently mention
their sexual orientation. How? By referring to their Significant Other in terms
which make that person's gender clear. Every time a poster on LUGNET mentions
his or her wife, husband, girlfriend, boyfriend... every cake topper or wedding
announcement, birth announcement etc... tells us something (though possibly not
everything) about the sexual orientation of those involved.

So, how many people who don't want to know anyone else's sexual orientation were
offended by this?
http://news.lugnet.com/build/?n=15173

Nobody, I hope. Posts like that are perfectly appropriate. Interesting that he
didn't know quite where to put it, though. Perhaps we do need a people.het!

Secondly, knowing someone's sexual orientation is not the same as "sexual
secrets". It tells you what gender of people they fall in love with, have
partner relationships with, build a family with, have sex with. It doesn't tell
you what they do in bed. Anything of that nature is coming out of the person
hearing the declaration's imagination.

Kevin

Verbal gymnastics from Kevin.  Sexual orientation may not tell you the specific
acts a particular couple performs in bed, but you'd have to be an idiot not to
know THE RANGE OF POSSIBLE ACTS two men or two women might do in bed together
(same with 'hets' as you call us, too, although I suppose it's better than
'breeders').  Come on, before the modern term of 'homosexual' was coined into
English, everyone knew what a sodomite was, and what kinds of specific acts it
was referring to.  Don't try to play naive here - none of us has just fallen off
the turnip truck lately.



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: Lavender Brick Society
 
(...) Whether you're wrong or right, what does it matter? Are you actually offended by the sexual acts that these two men might perform? Is that actually even what this is about or is this a dead end? If it really is the point, do those same acts (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Lavender Brick Society
 
(...) But isn't there a huge distinction here? Say, for instance, I said the following in the .storage group: "I was digging through my big bin of bricks last night, but the noise was really annoying my SO, because she was trying to sleep. I really (...) (20 years ago, 21-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)  
  Re: Lavender Brick Society
 
Interesting that you don't bother to address either of the two major points in my post, Lee (that heterosexuals frequently broadcast their sexual orientation by referring to the gender of their partners, and that sexual orientation is about (...) (20 years ago, 22-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Lavender Brick Society
 
(...) Not picking on you particularly Jojo, since this has been said several times by several people in different ways in this thread. There are a couple of points here. Firstly, heterosexuals frequently mention their sexual orientation. How? By (...) (20 years ago, 18-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

207 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR