Subject:
|
Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 13:11:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4314 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Lee Meyer wrote:
> > Secondly, knowing someone's sexual orientation is not the same as "sexual
> > secrets". It tells you what gender of people they fall in love with, have
> > partner relationships with, build a family with, have sex with. It doesn't tell
> > you what they do in bed. Anything of that nature is coming out of the person
> > hearing the declaration's imagination.
> Verbal gymnastics from Kevin. Sexual orientation may not tell you the specific
> acts a particular couple performs in bed, but you'd have to be an idiot not to
> know THE RANGE OF POSSIBLE ACTS two men or two women might do in bed together
> (same with 'hets' as you call us, too, although I suppose it's better than
> 'breeders'). Come on, before the modern term of 'homosexual' was coined into
> English, everyone knew what a sodomite was, and what kinds of specific acts it
> was referring to. Don't try to play naive here - none of us has just fallen off
> the turnip truck lately.
Whether you're wrong or right, what does it matter? Are you actually offended
by the sexual acts that these two men might perform? Is that actually even what
this is about or is this a dead end? If it really is the point, do those same
acts performed by a man and a woman offend you?
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| (...) Verbal gymnastics from Kevin. Sexual orientation may not tell you the specific acts a particular couple performs in bed, but you'd have to be an idiot not to know THE RANGE OF POSSIBLE ACTS two men or two women might do in bed together (same (...) (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
207 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
