 | | Re: Fair use and allusion? —John Neal
|
| | | (...) At the request of the sovereign, democratic nation of Iraq. (...) Look again. You'll see elections are on the horizon-- a concept quite foreign to dictators. (...) I have no response to the ignorance of this one. (...) If that is not the (...) (20 years ago, 2-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Fair use and allusion? —Pedro Silva
|
| | | | | (...) Sovereign, maybe, democratic no way. At least until proper elections take place, Iraq is still a technical dictatorship. So call it whatever else you want to at this stage. (...) You may be right, but I wouldn't be so vehement in condemning (...) (20 years ago, 2-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | I fear we are about to create yet another martyr. —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) My comment was also meant to cover expedient “trial” of the chap caught abusing prisoners in Iraq… I think it lasted ~1 hour. (...) I don't have time to list my concerns about SH’s appearance yesterday. It is suffice to say that I have yet to (...) (20 years ago, 2-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: I fear we aren't playing fair —Don Heyse
|
| | | | | | (...) Fair? What for? He cheats at everything, and (URL) here's the proof>. Enjoy, (20 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: I fear we aren't playing fair —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | (...) And besides, the US isn't into fair trials for terrorism suspects, why would they worry about a fair trial for SH? And if the US isn't worried, why should Iraq??? ROSCO (20 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Ignoring the proof that's right in front of you. —Don Heyse
|
| | | | | | (...) You didn't even look at (URL) the proof>, did you? (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Ignoring the proof that's right in front of you. —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | (...) Yes, I did. But I'm not sure what my browsing habits have to do with the topic at hand? ROSCO (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Ignoring the proof that's right in front of you. —Don Heyse
|
| | | | | | (...) Well, perhaps you should've replied directly to Scott, because you completely ignored what I had to say. Do you often speak just to hear the sound of your own voice? (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Ignoring the proof that's right in front of you. —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | | (...) Holy crap, I'm sorry I didn't conform *EXACTLY* to some strict unwritten forum rule of who should answer to who in what threads. Whatever. ROSCO (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Ignoring the proof that's right in front of you. —Don Heyse
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Liar. You're not sorry. You did it on purpose because you're one dimensional and have no sense of humor. (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Sarcasm —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Last I heard it's a humourous device. It was present in my last post, and (URL) this post>. Maybe you missed it? I guess maybe different people have different senses of humour. <SARCASM> I'd certainly never accuse you of not having a sense of (...) (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Sarcasm —Don Heyse
|
| | | | | | | | (...) From the internet. <www.cogsci.princeto...-bin/webwn Sarcasm: witty language used to convey insults or scorn>. Hee, hee. Don't know how I could have missed the insults and scorn. But you're right, I'm wrong. I see you are a funny guy after (...) (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Sarcasm —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I think this might not be formatted quite right, I think you need to put the http:// part on the front or else LUGNET thinks it is a relative link (shifted to plaintext so you could see it, but go upthread and try clicking on it to see what (...) (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | An apology —Don Heyse
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Ah perfect. Everyone seems distracted with BrickLinkGate, so.. I think it's long past time for me to take Larry's advice and "play nice". Yes, I admit it. I behaved like a total jerk when I posted to this thread way back in July (and probably (...) (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: An apology —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | (...) We all know it is always difficult to apologise, even a day, a week or a month or more later.. Hats off to you, Don. I hope those you were apologising to see it, and accept it. (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Ignoring the proof that's right in front of you. —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) Don, do you often go into bars looking for fights? Scott A (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Ignoring the proof that's right in front of you. —Don Heyse
|
| | | | | | (...) No. That's what this place is for. Right? (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Fair use and allusion? —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) John, don't be silly. (URL) Bush has no interest in democracy>. (...) Saddam held "elections" after he installed himself too. ;) (...) I note you do not counter my argument. (...) I note you do not counter my argument. (...) I note you do not (...) (20 years ago, 5-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
