Debate : 24638


Off-Topic / Debate / 24638	24637 \| 24639

Subject:	Re: Ignoring the proof that's right in front of you.
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Thu, 8 Jul 2004 01:08:08 GMT
Viewed:	1859 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Don Heyse wrote:

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford wrote:

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Don Heyse wrote:

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:

I don’t have time to list my concerns about SH’s appearance yesterday. It is suffice to say that I have yet to read one single report which agrees he’ll get a fair trial.

Fair? What for? He cheats at everything, and here’s the proof.

And besides, the US isn’t into fair trials for terrorism suspects, why would they worry about a fair trial for SH? And if the US isn’t worried, why should Iraq???

You didn’t even look at the proof, did you?

Yes, I did. But I’m not sure what my browsing habits have to do with the topic at hand?

ROSCO

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Ignoring the proof that's right in front of you.
(...) Well, perhaps you should've replied directly to Scott, because you completely ignored what I had to say. Do you often speak just to hear the sound of your own voice? (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Ignoring the proof that's right in front of you.
(...) You didn't even look at (URL) the proof>, did you? (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

106 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search