To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 24636
24635  |  24637
Subject: 
Re: Ignoring the proof that's right in front of you.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 8 Jul 2004 00:32:00 GMT
Viewed: 
1615 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Don Heyse wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
   I don’t have time to list my concerns about SH’s appearance yesterday. It is suffice to say that I have yet to read one single report which agrees he’ll get a fair trial.

Fair? What for? He cheats at everything, and here’s the proof.

And besides, the US isn’t into fair trials for terrorism suspects, why would they worry about a fair trial for SH? And if the US isn’t worried, why should Iraq???

You didn’t even look at the proof, did you?



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Ignoring the proof that's right in front of you.
 
(...) Yes, I did. But I'm not sure what my browsing habits have to do with the topic at hand? ROSCO (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: I fear we aren't playing fair
 
(...) And besides, the US isn't into fair trials for terrorism suspects, why would they worry about a fair trial for SH? And if the US isn't worried, why should Iraq??? ROSCO (20 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

106 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR