Subject:
|
Re: Some wins for freedom from the Supremes
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:28:14 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
602 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Parsons wrote:
| |
Apparently we are just fine with seeing our nationals taste justice American
style for activities with which they were associated in a country where it
was not illegal, activites which were not illegal under Australian law of the
time, and under a process which would be unacceptable in Australia even under
our shiny new wot laws.
Makes one proud of the lengths to which our leaders will go for our citizens,
not.
|
Gawd! If you’re presenting an accurate view, that really is disgusting. They
should have demanded their people back long ago.
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Some wins for freedom from the Supremes
|
| (...) Some quick research turns up that I am a little out of date - he's been (URL) charged> now. Its an interesting document. The rest of the summary seems pretty much spot on. (URL) seems to have been more or less the state of play before the (...) (20 years ago, 29-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Some wins for freedom from the Supremes
|
| (...) Yup. Indeed, as I understand it Australia is one of the few (perhaps the only) country with nationals involved who has NOT asked for them back. Apparently at the time our dudes did whatever undisclosed thing that they may at some stage be (...) (20 years ago, 29-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
