To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 23577
23576  |  23578
Subject: 
Re: Richard Clarke
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 22 Mar 2004 20:15:39 GMT
Viewed: 
206 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
   Richard Clarke Quotes: “Frankly, I find it outrageous that the president is running for re-election on the grounds that he’s done such great things about terrorism. He ignored it. He ignored terrorism for months, when maybe we could have done something to stop 9/11. Maybe. We’ll never know.”

More reason to clean house when a new administration comes in. Got any personal agendas, Mr. Clarke-- such as a book to sell?

I think Clarke pre-dates even Clinton; he is not the “kiss & tell” type.

Not if he is kissing Democrats.


Strange that O’Neil also said that Bush took his eye off the ball.

  
   Is he not acting in the US’s best interests?

More like CYA.

  
  
Why not tell us all you and the Clinton adminstration did after the attack on the USS Cole?

That would be the same attack you did not know about 2 weeks ago?

John Neal: “Nobody perceived OBL as a threat on September 10, 2001.”

That’s my point! It was HIS job to get that perception, and way back then!


Clarke is clear that he thought OBL was a problem... Bush did not want to hear.

  
  
   One could easily speculate that if we had hit and hurt Al-qaeda then, it might have stopped 9-11 from happening.


I thought OBL was not a threat? Your words: “Nobody perceived OBL as a threat on September 10, 2001”

If nothing else he should shut his piehole or take some responsibility instead of trying to profit and CYA at the same time.


That does not answer my point... is throw mud all you can do?

  
  
   Maybe. We’ll never know.

Take your money and CYA, you two-faced, partisan hack.

Why not tell us about how the Clinton administration stopped the attacks on LA on 1999/2000?

Anything to say?

  
  
BTW: Who made it to NY first after 911; Clinton or Bush? Who demonstrated leadership? Who ran for a bunker?

Who makes me laugh?

Does the answer to that Q hurt?

Scott A

  
JOHN



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Richard Clarke
 
(...) Not if he is kissing Democrats. (...) More like CYA. (...) That's my point! It was HIS job to get that perception, and way back then! (...) If nothing else he should shut his piehole or take some responsibility instead of trying to profit and (...) (21 years ago, 22-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

6 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR