Subject:
|
Re: Richard Clarke
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 22 Mar 2004 15:07:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
140 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
| |
Richard Clarke
Quotes: “Frankly, I find it outrageous that the president is running for
re-election on the grounds that he’s done such great things about terrorism.
He ignored it. He ignored terrorism for months, when maybe we could have
done something to stop 9/11. Maybe. We’ll never know.”
|
More reason to clean house when a new administration comes in. Got any personal
agendas, Mr. Clarke-- such as a book to sell?
Why not tell us all you and the Clinton adminstration did after the attack on
the USS Cole? One
could easily speculate that if we had hit and hurt Al-qaeda then, it might have
stopped 9-11 from happening. Maybe. We’ll never know.
Take your money and CYA, you two-faced, partisan hack.
JOHN
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Richard Clarke
|
| (...) I think Clarke pre-dates even Clinton; he is not the "kiss & tell" type. Is he not acting in the US's best interests? (...) That would be the same attack you did not know about 2 weeks ago? John Neal: "Nobody perceived OBL as a threat on (...) (21 years ago, 22-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Richard Clarke
|
| Richard Clarke (URL) Quotes>: "Frankly, I find it outrageous that the president is running for re-election on the grounds that he's done such great things about terrorism. He ignored it. He ignored terrorism for months, when maybe we could have done (...) (21 years ago, 22-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
