Subject:
|
Re: Richard Clarke
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 22 Mar 2004 16:39:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
202 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
| |
Richard Clarke
Quotes: “Frankly, I find it outrageous that the president is running for
re-election on the grounds that he’s done such great things about
terrorism. He ignored it. He ignored terrorism for months, when maybe we
could have done something to stop 9/11. Maybe. We’ll never know.”
|
More reason to clean house when a new administration comes in. Got any
personal agendas, Mr. Clarke-- such as a book to sell?
|
I think Clarke pre-dates even Clinton; he is not the “kiss & tell” type.
|
Not if he is kissing Democrats.
| |
Is
he not acting in the US’s best interests?
|
More like CYA.
| |
| |
Why not tell us all you and the Clinton adminstration did after the attack
on the USS Cole?
|
That would be the same attack you did not know about 2 weeks ago?
John Neal: “Nobody perceived OBL as a threat on September 10, 2001.”
|
That’s my point! It was HIS job to get that perception, and way back then!
| |
| |
One
could easily speculate that if we had hit and hurt Al-qaeda then, it might
have stopped 9-11 from happening.
|
I thought OBL was not a threat? Your words:
“Nobody perceived OBL as a threat on September 10, 2001”
|
If nothing else he should shut his piehole or take some responsibility instead
of trying to profit and CYA at the same time.
| |
| |
Maybe. We’ll never know.
Take your money and CYA, you two-faced, partisan hack.
|
Why not tell us about how the Clinton administration stopped the attacks on
LA on 1999/2000?
BTW: Who made it to NY first after 911; Clinton or Bush? Who demonstrated
leadership? Who ran for a bunker?
|
Who makes me laugh?
JOHN
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Richard Clarke
|
| (...) Strange that O'Neil also said that Bush took his eye off the ball. (...) Clarke is clear that he thought OBL was a problem... Bush did not want to hear. (...) That does not answer my point... is throw mud all you can do? (...) Anything to say? (...) (21 years ago, 22-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | Re: Richard "Dick" Clarke... on the BBC
|
| (...) He claims to have asked for a meeting with Bush 3 days after he came to power. RC wanted to talk about OBL; Bush only wanted to hear about Iraq! (URL) for yourself. In the same BBC interview, he also claims that Rumsfeld wanted to bomb Iraq on (...) (21 years ago, 23-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Richard Clarke
|
| (...) I think Clarke pre-dates even Clinton; he is not the "kiss & tell" type. Is he not acting in the US's best interests? (...) That would be the same attack you did not know about 2 weeks ago? John Neal: "Nobody perceived OBL as a threat on (...) (21 years ago, 22-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
