To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 23460
  Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles
 
(...) What courage? Newsom hasn't even been arrested for disobeying the law! I think I might come to California and steal your LEGO Pirate collection and expect equal treatment Newsom is getting under the law-- namely the law looking the other way. (...) (20 years ago, 10-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles
 
(...) Yet. Courage is standing up for something you believe in the face of the consequences - that the other side has turned out too gutless to do anything about it doesn't change that. I (...) Let me introduce you to my counter-argument: Winchester (...) (20 years ago, 10-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles
 
(...) lol, But -->Bruce<-- I would have expected a little snickersnee from you! Nonetheless, Kewl-- does it still fire, and more importantly: do your Liberal buddies know you own a gun;-) (...) lol I would have said Massachusetts, long before (...) (20 years ago, 11-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles
 
(...) Works fine - actually, I had no idea what model it was until I just looked. I presumed it was some thing my grandfather got in the 60's - which he may have, but by it's serial number it is actually 100 years old (1904). Dang. Snickersnee? (...) (20 years ago, 11-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles
 
(...) I've got a bolo tie... (...) I read that too early in my life-- never got it. (...) lol Just rented that to watch with my son a while back (catching him up on all of the classics:-) (...) lol If you are going to lob a fat one over the plate, (...) (20 years ago, 11-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles
 
(...) That's precisely the problem. You are a bigot and narrow-minded, only, you can't understand that fact and therefore, you think you are not and that everyone else is wrong. You compare Gay marriages to brother-sister marriages and group (...) (20 years ago, 11-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles
 
(...) Merely because I think I'm right doesn't make me narrow-minded or a bigot. You think that you're right and I'm wrong.... As far as accusing me of thinking that everybody else is wrong, well I think that you have me confused with Dave! :-) (...) (20 years ago, 11-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles
 
(...) Oh, give me a frelling break! The world is not coming to an end because 50% of marriages fail, and the world won't come to an end if gays are allowed to *marry*. The society is {not} based on marriage. The Nuclear Family is a farce and a (...) (20 years ago, 11-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR