Subject:
|
Re: Babies who threaten to topple Israel?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 20 Jan 2004 15:52:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
723 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Harro de Jong wrote:
> dr_scott_arthur@yahoo.co.uk (Scott A) wrote in <Hrs768.1LwG@lugnet.com>:
>
> > *Sigh* The item cited above is the result of an academic study which was
> > published in a peer reviewed journal by a respected academic.
> >
> > Do you have something similar to support your argument, or are you just
> > "shooting from the hip"?
>
>
> In view of your response somewhere else in this topic,
> [quote]
> JO: I think the correct phrase should be "Anti-Israelism", and not
> JO: "Antisemitism".
>
> SA: I prefer the term "pro-justice".
> [/quote]
*SIGH* Did you even read the cite I gave in that post?
My comment referred to that fact that a lot of legitimate criticism of the
Israeli right is simply labelled as "anti-Semitism" by blind supporters of
Sharon. Neither the term "Anti-Israelism" or "anti-Semitism" describes much of
the legitimate criticism of Israel. If you look closely, you will see that a lot
of Israel’s biggest critics are Jewish... and proud of it.
In this thread, I have evidenced the pro-Isreali bias in the media, shown how
Sharon suppresses free speech and illustrated how Sharon lacks democratic
credentials. So far, you have brought nothing but dogma to this debate.
>
> I don't think I'll bother.
...and I don't think you can!
Scott A
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Babies who threaten to topple Israel?
|
| dr_scott_arthur@yahoo.co.uk (Scott A) wrote in <Hrs768.1LwG@lugnet.com>: (...) In view of your response somewhere else in this topic, [quote] JO: I think the correct phrase should be "Anti-Israelism", and not JO: "Antisemitism". SA: I prefer the (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
