 | | Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap) —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | (...) LOL. No they just are not considered part of the militia. (...) You do know that there are more Americans in formally declared militia groups than in the US Military right? (...) Yes but human nature has not. (...) I suppose we can both agree (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap) —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) Is that true? I don't dispute it, but I wasn't aware of it. If it's true, then what level of gov't official is included? Dave! (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap) —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | | | (...) Well I think it was more a tongue in cheek reply to a tongue in cheek question. It is based off of the statement by George Mason “I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials.” I would say that is (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap) —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | (...) In the main, the militia merely means an armed group of freepersons that are not otherwise playing some kind of official role or duty. I mean, a sheriff might call together a posse comitatus and work closely with one -- but he remains the (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap) —David Koudys
|
| | | | (...) <snip> (...) Selective interpretation at it's finest! Now look who's disregarding the founders, framers, fathers. Nicely done! Dave K (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | The Gun Debate Ad Nauseum —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | (...) What can you mean?! You're starting to be quite the jerk about this subject. I write a long explanation and you hit me with some vague argument without explanation. I won't waste my time on you again like this... It was my understanding that (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Gun Debate Ad Nauseum —David Koudys
|
| | | | (...) Well, I decided to pull a "Richard" and delete the entire post and put in its place a trite answer. Seems to work well for you, so I thought it'd work equally as well for me. Dave K (21 years ago, 23-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
