To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 22454
22453  |  22455
Subject: 
Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 20 Oct 2003 02:37:20 GMT
Viewed: 
808 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti wrote:
   Once again, in the category of “Why Bother?”...

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Justin Pankey wrote:
   Neo-Nazi’s and the KKK are not Christians at all! The term means one that follows Christ and His teachings. There is no evidence in any of Christ’s teaching that He would suppport the actions of these groups, in fact their actions are entirely counter to the fundamental teaching of Christ.

You do not get to decide that -- they do! I am pretty sure a Xtian is anyone calling themselves a Xtian, however misguided you may think their beliefs may be. For example, President Shrub thinks of himself as a Xtian -- I think it’s just his cloak to commit atrocities in the world, but it doesn’t change the fact that he identifies himself as Xtian. Same thing for Boykin, who is covered elsewhere in this forum.

In any religion there are certain core values that one must adhere too to be considered part of the group. If your line of thinking were valid, I could call myself an atheist and still claim to believe in God and you would be powerless to challange that assertion.

Further, if you believe that President Bush is commiting “atrocities” by trying to wipe out terrorism and dictatorships then to this debate I say “Why bother?” You are lost in more ways than one ;o)
  
   In Christianity God is seen as “God the Father” a God that you can personally know and one that acts as a human father (love plus dicipline). In Islam, for example, Allah is not personally knowable and his character is more “dictatorial.” Articles on this subject fill many complex pages. The bottom line is that the societies where many people are uneducated/illiterate and taught the dictates of Islam...those societies tend to be MUCH MORE subject to becoming dictatorships.

Again, you do not get to decide these various issues for people. There are many flavors of of Xtianity and Islam with varying degrees of a “dictatorial” godhead. To borrow and repair your phrase: “complex articles on this subject fill many pages.”

Thank you for the repair I obvoiusly missed that in the proof.
  
And finally, this part was interesting: “The bottom line is that the societies where many people are uneducated/illiterate and taught the dictates of Islam...those societies tend to be MUCH MORE subject to becoming dictatorships.”

Oh yeah, then explain the history of Germany in the last century to me? How about that of Italy? Japan?

Germany was ripe for a dictator like Hitler because the country was ravaged by the reparations forced upon it at the end of World War I.
  
With the McCarthy Era behind us, but with our recent/current bout with the forces arrayed against american liberty; how do you measure our supposedly “Xtian” ripeness for a dictatorship? I think ALL of the people in power today seeking to limit american freedoms are Xtian -- it’s an interesting correlation to many because it seems to suggest a nexus between people of a particular faith and a certain kind of apocalyptic irrationality that is problematic in our western culture. You may disagree with their agenda as much as I do, but do you deny that they often dress up their goals in Xtian terms in an attempt to appeal to the Xtian-right? I mean, for all I know they actually believe their own pyscho-Xtian agenda. But which do you find less worrying: they they actually believe it, or that they don’t but that it is a useful political tool for them?


I believe Bush is an honest Christian and I’m actually proud to have him as President...to which you and I now diverge with not hope of reconciliation :o)

I can only imagine which freedoms you feel are being attacked. It’s the social freedoms and divergence from a Christian society in the early 70’s that has lead to the breakdown in family for which we are all now paying a heavy price in America. Statistics regarding out of wedlock births, fatherless homes, lack of respect for human life, etc. all correlate very well with the rising crime rates and lack of personal responsibility that has seen hundredfold increases in recent decades. The resulting social breakdown that occurs when people refuse to limit their own behavior based on a religious morality only causes the government to create more laws to do the limiting for them. Some of founding fathers even acknowledged this fact.
  
Stop being so myopic, please! There are many flavors of religion and belief; many of them deeply offensive to those of us that love peace more than any possible god.

If I were truly myopic I would not have even paid attention to this little discussion. Peace is a great goal, but not while millions worldwide are suffering and oppressed by evil dictators. What? Do you believe that if all people world wide gave up religious conviction we would suddenly live in a peaceful utopia...that man is basically good? If so than how do you explain the history of the last century to ME? And who decides what is right and what is wrong...you with your peaceful thoughts, or Hitler and Saddam who felt/fell they were doing right?

Justin



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
 
Sorry to all for the typos in my replies within this forum...(just noticed after a little nap). I've been quite ill lately and will sign off from this debate until I can concentrate good enough to at least proof my own posts correctly :o) Justin (21 years ago, 20-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
  Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
 
(...) Atheism is not a religion, although I know Xtians like to think that it is. However we are looking at dictionary definitions here -- my dictionary says that being a Xtian can be defined as simply as "one who professes a belief in Jesus." All (...) (21 years ago, 20-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
 
Once again, in the category of "Why Bother?"... (...) You do not get to decide that -- they do! I am pretty sure a Xtian is anyone calling themselves a Xtian, however misguided you may think their beliefs may be. For example, President Shrub thinks (...) (21 years ago, 19-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

220 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR