To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 21993
21992  |  21994
Subject: 
Moore foolishness than ever
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 26 Aug 2003 13:22:42 GMT
Viewed: 
123 times
  
I’ve resisted introducing this topic because we’ve been over it before, and the main issue is, to me, entirely resolved and crystal clear. But Roy Moore still keeps going on about his unconstitutional monument to his hubris.

So what’s the deal? Here’s a judge who willfully, publicly, and expensively flauts the law of the land, yet he would presumably still declare himself an authority in dispensing justice to those who would come before his court. Although he has been suspended, and rightly so, how can he claim any moral authority after he himself has directly violated the law?

I don’t have any means to assess the sincerity of his faith (though I admit that he does seem to protest too much). I also don’t care if he wants to erect a 10-ton monument on private property. But for an officer of the court to enshrine a religion this way in the public arena is anathema to the Constitution. For that matter, I think his argument that the decalogue is the “moral foundation” of our legal system is specious at best; I can’t seem to find the Constitutional Amendment about “honoring my father and mother” or enjoining me to “keep holy the Lord’s day.” And where’s the one about coveting my neighbor’s wife?

Dave!



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Moore foolishness than ever
 
(...) As a Christian, I'm 'outraged' about this situation. I mean, in the Bible it tells us to 'respect' the authority of the land. So not only is what Roy doing 'unconstitutional', but is going contrary to sound Biblical teachings. I'm not a (...) (21 years ago, 26-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
  Re: Moore foolishness than ever
 
(...) Ahem. There is only one item in the Constitution of the United States that has any direct bearing on this as a religious matter, and that's the First Amemdment. To quote the appropriate section: "Congress shall make no law respecting an (...) (21 years ago, 27-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

7 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR