 | | Re: With Saddam's sons dead, now we just need to bag dad (Baghdad get it?) —John Neal
|
| | | (...) So are you asserting that because they never had their day in court, they were innocent? (...) Your comparison is, if not completely laughable, not analogous. (...) Dude, to go out in a blaze of glory was their decision! I read a quotation (...) (21 years ago, 24-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: With Saddam's sons dead, now we just need to bag dad (Baghdad get it?) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | (...) What ever happened to “innocent until proven guilty”? BTW: How hypocritical will it be if (as has been suggested) Rumsfeld publishes pictures of their bodies? Scott A (21 years ago, 24-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: With Saddam's sons dead, now we just need to bag dad (Baghdad get it?) —Pedro Silva
|
| | | | | | (...) That can't be applicable, the institutions whose legitimacy for trial was recognized have been overpassed. Trial would therefore be a farce without an impartial judge. (...) No longer "if". IMO it's just a question of taste (or sensibility, if (...) (21 years ago, 24-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: With Saddam's sons dead, now we just need to bag dad (Baghdad get it?) —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | (...) Y'know, I cannot recall a single instance before the administration of Shrub where the idea of detaining people in contravention of the most basic of all of our supposedly protected civil rights AND the idea of torturing them was part of every (...) (21 years ago, 24-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: With Saddam's sons dead, now we just need to bag dad (Baghdad get it?) —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | (...) Wrong again, John...that blaze of glory seems to have been more of a fizzle. It appears they were taken out with an overwhelming amount of force. Of course, it may have been strategically better to have taken them alive too. Excessive Force? (...) (21 years ago, 25-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: With Saddam's sons dead, now we just need to bag dad (Baghdad get it?) —David Koudys
|
| | | | (...) A thoroughly good read as well: (URL) K (21 years ago, 25-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: With Saddam's sons dead, now we just need to bag dad (Baghdad get it?) —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | (...) (URL) Kooties, Todd's crazy FTX wants you to use your angle brackets, k? -- Hop-Frog (21 years ago, 25-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
